Reference:
Posadzki P, Watson L,
Ernst E. Contamination and adulteration of
herbal medicinal products (HMPs): an overview of systematic reviews. Eur J
Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(3):295-307. Abstract available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00228-012-1353-z.
Researchers
from the University of Exeter, UK, performed an extensive literature search on contamination and adulteration of herbal medicinal products (HMPs). The authors
distinguished between adulteration, defined as “fraudulent
practices in which a HMP is substituted partially or fully with impure, extraneous, improper or inferior products/substances,” and contamination,
defined as “the undesired introduction of impurities of a chemical or microbiological nature,
or of foreign matter, into or onto a starting material, intermediate product or
finished herbal product during production, sampling, packaging or repackaging,
storage or transport.” The literature search provided 4,366
articles, but only 26 met the criteria established by the authors for systematic
reviews on the issue that were included for further evaluation.
Contaminants reported included pollen, dust, microbes, parasites, toxins, pesticides, and heavy
metals. Reports on adulteration were mainly due to the admixture of undisclosed
prescription drugs. (In the US, the addition of prescription drugs to herbal
dietary supplements is seen less as a problem of adulteration per se but is characterized more
accurately as the illegal sale of drugs masquerading as dietary supplements.) The presence of contaminants and adulterants caused mild-to-severe adverse events,
and was observed most often with Asian products. The authors pointed out that
many of the systematic reviews were of poor quality, but indicated that “adulteration and contamination of HMPs occurs with some
regularity, particularly in Asian preparations,” and that “such deficits in
product quality have the potential to cause serious harm to patients.”
Comment: While the presence of excessive amounts of pollen and dust may
be undesirable, finding pollen on some flowers and aerial parts material is relatively common and often unavoidable. Similarly, the presence of dust can be
a by-product of processing, such as grinding, and is equally unavoidable. If these materials fall within acceptable ranges of foreign matter as established
in pharmacopeial monographs, they are not regarded as contaminants. On the other hand, the detection of pharmacologically active or toxic material in
herbal medicinal products is of much greater concern to human health. In the
publication, the authors cited admixture of prescription drugs as a frequent
cause of adverse effects, but pointed out a only a few number of cases of
botanical adulteration, e.g., the isolated cases of belladonna (Atropa belladonna, Solanaceae) alkaloids
and rhubarb (Rheum officinale, Polygonaceae)
leaf in Essiac (a combination product containing burdock [Arctium lappa, Asteraceae] root, sheep sorrel [Rumex acetosella, Polygonaceae] leaves, slippery elm [Ulmus rubra syn. U. fulva, Ulmaceae] bark, and rhubarb root) dating back to the
1970s, or the contamination of star anise (Illicium
verum, Schisandraceae) with the toxic Japanese star anise (I. anisatum). Based on the paper, the
sale of prescription drugs disguised as dietary supplements, or presence of
contaminants like lead or arsenic, are the major concerns, and occur more
frequently than adulteration of botanical materials.