In
his book Insectivorous Plants, which
was first published in 1875, English
naturalist and evolutionary biologist Charles Darwin wrote that the Venus
flytrap (Dionaea muscipula,
Droseraceae) “is one of the most wonderful [plants] in the world.”1 Now,
that “wonderful” plant is still being threatened in the wild by a combination
of poaching (and overharvesting in general), habitat loss, fire suppression,
wetland drainage, seed collection, and other factors.2-4
Based
on information from the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program’s database, it
is estimated that approximately 73,000 to 158,000 individual plants remain
in the wild. “This
may sound like a lot, but these populations are very imperiled and the threats
to these populations are high,” wrote Laura Robinson, a botanist with the
Natural Heritage Program (email, April 4, 2017).
The
Venus flytrap is native to a small area in southeastern North Carolina and
northeastern South Carolina,5 but it has reportedly been naturalized
in other states, including Florida and New Jersey.6 Specifically, it
is found within an approximately 75-mile radius of the port city of Wilmington,
North Carolina.2 The colonial governor of North Carolina, Arthur Dobbs,
who may have been the first to document the species, noted the plant’s limited
geographical range in a 1759 letter to his friend, English botanist Peter
Collinson: “We have a kind of Catch Fly Sensitive which closes upon anything
that touches it. It grows in this latitude 34 but not in 35°.”7
According
to the book Dionaea: Venus’s Flytrap (Redfern
Natural History Productions, 2012), the Venus flytrap has been entirely
eliminated from about 1.5 million acres of habitat across the northeastern part
of its natural range, and has also been eliminated from south and central parts
of its range. Although a few populations persist along the extreme western
periphery of the plant’s range in the Sandhills region of North Carolina, these
populations are separated by more than 50 miles from all other Venus flytrap
sites. Furthermore, most of the limited remaining populations include less than
500 individual plants, and the authors consider it unlikely that these
populations will be viable in the long term.4
In addition
to capturing insects, arachnids, and, occasionally, even small frogs and snails,8
the Venus flytrap, like other carnivorous plants, has captured the imagination
of many people for years. Exaggerated depictions of carnivorous plants, often oversized
and man-eating, have been featured prominently in fictional works, such as Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle’s 1880 short story The
American’s Tale: An Arizona Tragedy, John Wyndham’s 1951 novel The Day of the Triffids, and the 1960 film
and subsequent musical The Little Shop of
Horrors9 (and the 1986 film adaptation of the musical). Fascination
(propelled by Darwin’s 1875 book), and perhaps often obsession, with
carnivorous plants in general and with the Venus flytrap in particular have led
to extensive harvesting of the plant in the wild, and this is one of the main
causes of its decline.
Current Outlook
Poaching
The
Venus flytrap became officially protected by North Carolina legislation in
1956, but overharvesting has remained a problem for decades.2 In
1981, it was estimated that between 1.4 million and 4.5 million plants were
sold annually within the United States, the majority of which were thought to
be of wild origin. In 1990, 1,077,227 plants (mostly bulbs, but also 200,000-300,000
whole plants) were exported from North Carolina , and none were exported from South
Carolina.10
On
December 1, 2014, it became a felony in North Carolina for any person to dig up,
pull up, take, or aid in taking or carrying away a Venus flytrap plant, or the
seed thereof, growing on the land of another person, or from the public domain,
without a permit signed by the landowner. Previously, this was a misdemeanor,
punishable by a maximum fine of $50, but offenders can now face up to two years
or more in prison.2,11
In
South Carolina, it is a misdemeanor to “cut, collect, break or otherwise
destroy” Venus flytrap plants on private or public property without the owner’s
consent. If convicted, offenders “shall be fined not more than two hundred
dollars or imprisoned not more than thirty days nor less than five days. Each
violation shall constitute a separate offense.”12 In the past, Venus
flytrap poaching has apparently been “minimal” in South Carolina, where a small
percentage of the plants occur.10
The
Venus flytrap grows in boggy areas with moist, acidic soil that is usually poor
in nutrients.6 “People find them in their backyards occasionally,”
wrote Debbie Crane, director of communications for the North Carolina chapter
of The Nature Conservancy (TNC), a nonprofit conservation organization that
works around the world to protect ecologically important lands and waters for
nature and people (email, March 28, 2017). “And we know of a couple of spots
where they are likely, but the property is in private hands. It is fair to say
that most of the flytraps are on property owned by TNC, other land trusts, the
government [state and federal], and the US Department of Defense.”
In
January 2015, four men were arrested for poaching Venus flytraps on the Holly
Shelter Game Land preserve. Although TNC originally protected much of what now
makes up this 63,494-acre preserve, it is now owned by the North Carolina
Wildlife Resources Commission, a state government agency created to conserve
and sustain the state’s fish and wildlife resources. The men had 970 plants in
their possession and became the first people charged with a felony for poaching
the Venus flytrap. Two of the men were sentenced to 24 months of supervised
probation, one was sentenced to 12 months of supervised probation, and the
other, who was the only one to not plead guilty, was sentenced to six to 17
months in prison.2,3
The
Venus flytrap, which can be smaller than a US dime, can be found in Croatan
National Forest, on land owned by the North Carolina Division of Parks and
Recreation, and on Wildlife Resources Commission game lands in Pender,
Brunswick, Onslow, and New Hanover counties.13 The plant also occurs
on several preserves owned by TNC, but the only one of these that is open to
the public is the Green Swamp in Brunswick County, according to Crane.
“We’ve had flytraps poached on our land,” Crane told Scientific American, adding that thefts
of a thousand plants at a time were all too common.3 “What makes
poaching so sad and stupid is that the people who are doing it are local
folks,” she continued. “They’re not making much money off of it. They’re
selling the bulbs for maybe 25 cents.”
Other sources, however, indicate that the poaching can be
lucrative.10,13 Poachers reportedly often sell to out-of-state
distributors, and a single plant typically fetches between $7 and $10 at a
store.13
In
the past, the Wildlife Resources Commission made about 10 to 20 arrests per
year for poaching on land it controls, but the arrests usually amounted to
nothing more than a slap on the wrist before poaching became a felony.13
“A lot of guys we catch—it’s sad to say—it’s a family tradition,” Sergeant
Brandon Dean, of the law enforcement division of the Wildlife Resources
Commission, was quoted as saying. “We caught their dad and their dad’s dad.”
Dean also reportedly estimated that one person might be caught for every 200
instances of poaching.2
Previously,
some offenders continued to poach Venus flytraps even after as many as 20
encounters with law enforcement. The results of poaching could also be seen at
depleted and extirpated sites.10
According
to Dean, when poachers are caught it is often because authorities have been
tipped off by other poachers who are protecting “their turf,” or by others,
such as bird watchers or hikers.2
It is
too soon to determine whether the stiffer penalties for poaching have helped mitigate
the situation. “But [they] certainly [haven’t] done any harm,” Crane wrote. “The
first arrests got lots of attention, which is a good thing.”
In The New York Times, Dean was quoted as
saying, “I would like to think with it being a felony, it put a damper on it.
The teeth have definitely been sharpened.” He is, however, reportedly doubtful
that the poaching will stop completely. He noted that the burden is on
enforcers to prove that plants were poached, which is difficult because,
according to him, there is no way to distinguish between a plant that was poached
from the wild and one that was legally raised in a greenhouse.2
However,
according to a 2010 National Geographic article,
the North Carolina Department of Agriculture, at the time, had been dabbing
Venus flytraps in the wild with a harmless, invisible dye that glows in
ultraviolet light to allow authorities to determine whether flytraps being sold
were poached.14
Interestingly,
in 2013, Kurup et al. discovered that in the presence of ultraviolet radiation
the Venus flytrap (specifically the inside portion of the lobes of the traps)
and some other carnivorous species (e.g., pitcher plants in the genus Nepenthes
[Nepenthiaceae]) can attract prey by naturally emitting fluorescent blue
light that is clearly visible to insects and other arthropods.15 According
to Baby Sabulal, PhD, principal scientist at the Jawaharlal Nehru Tropical
Botanic Garden and Research Institute in Kerala, India, and co-author of the
study, the Venus flytrap that was analyzed was collected from their garden
collection and had not been treated with any dye (email, March 31, 2017).
Furthermore, the team consistently found even stronger fluorescent emissions in
the Nepenthes species that were
analyzed, he wrote.
Conserving
the Venus flytrap may also have implications for tourism and, consequently, the
economy in North Carolina. “We’ve had people from
all over the world come here to see flytraps,” Crane was quoted as saying. “If
the plants are gone, [some] tourists are not going to visit.”3
Also
according to Crane, poaching isn’t necessary because the plants can easily be
cloned (e.g., by cutting). “Flytraps love cloning,” Crane was quoted as saying.
“You can create them in a greenhouse very easily, and it’s being done all over
the world. They are being sold legally in a lot of places because they are
cloned.”3 The Venus flytrap can also be grown from seed, but it usually
takes several years.16
According
to TNC, there is a good chance that plants sold at a flea market, on the
roadside, or online were poached. To help protect Venus flytraps, TNC
recommends buying from reputable dealers that do not sell poached stock.5
Development and Other Threats
“Poaching
is a big problem, but so is development,” Crane wrote. Many Venus flytrap
habitats have been lost over the last century to development.3
According to Dionaea: Venus’s Flytrap,
a 2005 follow-up survey of South Carolina Venus flytrap sites found that 70% of
the recorded sites had been replaced with golf courses and parking lots.4
Protecting
flytrap habitats from development and other threats may also have implications
for other rare species. One Venus flytrap site was found to support as many as
42 other rare plant species within 25 square meters.4
“TNC
and the North Carolina Coastal Land Trust have done a lot of work to protect
flytrap territory,” Crane wrote. “Protecting and restoring habitat is probably
more important than efforts focused on poaching.” (One expert peer reviewer of
this article noted that poached habitat can still feasibly regrow flytraps
while paved habitat obviously cannot.)
The
mission of the North Carolina Coastal Land Trust is “to enrich the coastal
communities of North Carolina through conservation of natural areas and working
landscapes, education, and the promotion of good land stewardship,” according
to its website.17 It has become the largest land trust,
geographically, in the state, and it is qualified to accept and hold
conservation agreements. Landowners who are interested in protecting their land
from development may choose to enter into a conservation agreement with a
qualified conservation organization or government body. This legally binding agreement
permanently limits the uses of all or part of a property in exchange for tax
savings, charitable contributions deductions, income tax credits, and lower
property taxes for the landowner.18
The
Coastal Land Trust holds conservation agreements on two properties with
flytraps. In addition, it has purchased in fee title three properties with
flytraps; it owns and manages two of these as nature preserves, and it transferred
the other (which abuts part of the Croatan National Forest) to the Wildlife
Resources Commission to be managed as game land (email from Janice Allen,
deputy director of the Coastal Land Trust, April 3, 2017).
Although
many of the remaining known Venus flytraps occur on protected lands, development
is still a significant concern for at least two reasons, according to Crane.
First, TNC, which manages preserves in all 50 US states and has protected more
than 700,000 acres in North Carolina alone (from the Outer Banks to the
Southern Blue Ridge Mountains),19 suspects the plants also occur on some
unprotected private lands because those lands are similar to the public lands
where the plants are known to occur. “If those lands are developed, then the
plants [that TNC suspects grow there] will be lost as well,” she wrote. Second,
“development can have a negative effect on nearby lands that may already be
protected by draining them, causing runoff, or preventing the use of fire to
restore land. When you have neighborhoods close by, it is really hard to put
controlled burns on the ground.”
Fire
is particularly important for the Venus flytrap. Without it, shrubs take over
and shade out the sun-loving plants, which need an open understory (the layer
of vegetation, especially the trees and shrubs, between the canopy and the
ground cover) to survive. Fire suppression may help protect human developments,
but it has affected large swathes of land that Venus flytraps inhabit,
including the Green Swamp. TNC is working to restore these habitats through
controlled, or prescribed, burns that mimic natural fires.5,6
“We
do use controlled burning to manage habitat for flytraps and other plants,”
Crane wrote. “Ideally, the fires should be put on the land in a regular
interval.”
There is evidence that with a fire
return interval (i.e., the time between fires in a specified area) of more than
five years, Venus flytrap populations decline precipitously. In addition, some
data show that the largest and densest remaining flytrap populations occur in
places with the longest and most regular history of burning.4*
In
the future, rising sea levels may also pose a concern. “[Venus flytraps] only
occur in low-lying areas near the coast, so, yes, over time, sea level rise
will likely affect them,” Crane wrote.†
Changing
soil fertility may also affect the Venus flytrap. The soil of bogs typically
contains little nitrogen and phosphorus. So, the Venus flytrap, like other
carnivorous plants, has adapted to obtain these nutrients in other ways,
thereby compensating for the deficiencies of the soil. However, pollution from
power plants and agricultural runoff has added extra nitrogen to many bogs in
North America, and this can prove fatal to carnivorous plants, presumably
including the Venus flytrap, which are so attuned to low levels of nitrogen.14
Conservation Status and Regulations
The
Venus flytrap is considered vulnerable‡ according to the Red List criteria of the
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).20 Version 3.1
of the Red List Categories and Criteria
states that a taxon is vulnerable “when the best available evidence indicates
that it meets” at least one of the listed criteria, “and it is therefore
considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild.”21
The Venus flytrap was among 250 rare and threatened species included in the
first IUCN Plant Red Data Book,
published in 1978. The publication arose from pioneering work by botanists at
the Herbarium at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in England, who recognized that
the plights of many plant species in danger of extinction were less publicized
than the plights of some rare and charismatic animals.8
The
IUCN’s Red List of Threatened Species is
the world’s most comprehensive information source on the conservation status of
plant, animal, and fungal species. The Red
List Categories and Criteria provides an explicit, objective framework for
classifying species at high risk of global extinction, based on parameters such
as population reduction and restricted geographic range.22
The
Venus flytrap is also currently listed in Appendix II of the Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).23
CITES, which came into effect in 1975, is an international agreement intended
to ensure that international trade of certain animal and plant species does not
threaten the survival of those species. Currently, 183 countries, or Parties, including
the United States, have voluntarily agreed to adhere to the Convention. CITES is
legally binding for the Parties, but it does not take the place of national
laws. Instead, each Party must adopt domestic legislation to ensure that CITES
is implemented at the national level.24 Currently, more than 35,000
species of animals and plants, including the Venus flytrap, are listed among
the three CITES appendices, which afford varying degrees of protection.24-25
Appendix
II includes species that are not necessarily threatened with extinction but for
which trade must be controlled to avoid overexploitation. For these species,
including the Venus flytrap, “an export permit or re-export certificate issued
by the Management Authority of the State of export or re-export is required. An
export permit may be issued only if the specimen was legally obtained and if
the export will not be detrimental to the survival of the species. A re-export
certificate may be issued only if the specimen was imported in accordance with
the Convention.” However, import permits
are not needed for species listed in Appendix II “unless required by national
law.”25
In
October 2016, a petition filed with the Secretary of the Interior requested the
United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to immediately protect the
Venus flytrap as a recognized endangered species under the Endangered Species
Act (ESA) of 1973.** The ESA states that a species shall be determined to be endangered
or threatened based on any of five factors, and the petitioners wrote that the
Venus flytrap is threatened by at least four of those factors (i.e., curtailment
of habitat, overutilization, inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms, and
other natural or manmade factors). “The
decision by the [USFWS] not to list the Venus Flytrap as Threatened or
Endangered in 1993 has led to continuing declines in its range and abundance
since then,” the petitioners wrote.27
Benefits for plants and animals that
are listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA include the following:
protection from being jeopardized by federal activities, protection from having
critical habitat destroyed or adversely modified, restrictions on take and
trade, a requirement that the USFWS develop and implement recovery plans for
listed species under US jurisdiction, authorization to seek land purchases or
exchanges for important habitat, and federal aid to state and commonwealth
conservation departments with cooperative endangered species agreements.
Listing can also encourage conservation efforts by other agencies, independent
organizations, and individuals.28
“We have reached a
situation in which there are more flytraps in captivity than in the wild,” Donald
Waller, PhD, a professor of botany at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who
co-authored and signed the petition, was quoted as saying. “That might be
construed as good news, if it assures they will survive in captivity, but it's
distressing for ecologists and conservation biologists. A population can only
persist and evolve in its native habitat, and we've already seen the
disappearance of 90 percent of wild plants. We have lost whole bogs,
populations and individuals.”29
Medicinal Properties of the Venus Flytrap
The
Venus flytrap contains compounds that can benefit human health, including
naphthoquinones, phenolic acids, and flavonoids.30
According
to a 2013 review by Gaascht et al., more than 15 compounds have been isolated
from the Venus flytrap, although most of these are also found in other plants.
At the time of the review, only one compound thought to be unique to the Venus
flytrap with medicinal potential had been isolated: diomuscipulone. This
naphthoquinone, however, has apparently not been tested for its biological
activity.30
Many
of the compounds found in the Venus flytrap, including the naphthoquinone
plumbagin (also present in Plumbago
zeylanica [Plumbaginaceae] and other plants) and the phenolic acids ellagic
acid (also present in pomegranate [Punica
granatum, Lythraceae] and many other
plants) and salicylic acid (also present in Salix
spp. [Salicaceae]), have been shown to modulate the NF-ĸB cell-signaling
pathway. This may be significant because this pathway is involved in the
development and progression of many types of cancers.30
Several
of the compounds found in the Venus flytrap, including salicylic acid and the
flavonoids quercetin and kaempferol (which are both present in Ginkgo biloba [Ginkgoaceae] and many other
plants), have been the subjects of pharmacokinetic studies and clinical trials.
Though most studies show that these compounds have poor bioavailability, it has
been shown that co-treatment with a natural compound like quercetin or
kaempferol and a chemotherapeutic drug like cisplatin or etoposide is more
efficient than a single treatment, probably because of the ability of the natural
compounds to block a specific drug resistance mechanism used by cancer cells.30
Plumbagin
may be one of the most promising anticancer compounds present in the Venus
flytrap.30 It has demonstrated anticancer and antiproliferative
activities in animal models and cell cultures and has been shown to target a
wide range of cancer types, including breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian
cancer, acute promyelocytic leukemia, and prostate cancer.31
In
addition, plumbagin and its derivatives appear to have antibacterial
properties. A 2013 in vitro study showed that the plumbagin derivatives
maritinone and 3,3’-biplumbagin (isolated from a plant other than the Venus
flytrap) were 32 times more potent than the antimycobacterial drug rifampicin against
a strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis that
was pan-resistant (i.e., resistant to all five first-line anti-tuberculosis
drugs). The authors concluded that these two derivatives have the potential for
development as new anti-tuberculosis drugs, especially against resistant
strains.32
In
the 1970s, the German physician Helmut Keller, MD, observed a Venus flytrap
while in a flower shop in Maine and wondered if the plant contained substances
that could be used selectively against tumor cells. He eventually developed a
patented extract of the Venus flytrap called Carnivora.33 Although
some anecdotal evidence suggests that Carnivora may be an effective cancer
therapy,34 it does not appear to have been the subject of any human
clinical trials. According to the Carnivora website, its manufacturing process
does not use any Venus flytraps from wild habitats.35
Daniel
Moerman’s Native American Ethnobotany,
a highly respected compilation of the ethnobotanical uses of North American
plants by Native American peoples, does
not indicate that the Venus flytrap was used medicinally by Native Americans,
but it does state that the Cherokee used a “small piece of plant chewed and
spat on bait for fishing.”36
Although
the Venus flytrap does not seem to be a major part of the commercial herb
trade, the plant does contain compounds with demonstrated anticancer effects
and other potentially beneficial biological activities.
Botany and History of the Venus Flytrap
The
Venus flytrap is an herbaceous perennial that, from a rhizome, produces a
low-growing rosette (which can be five inches tall and eight inches wide) of up
to eight or more bristly, spreading, basal leaves (traps) that can each be five
inches long. White flowers bloom in spring, from about May to June, on leafless
stems that rise above the foliage up to about one foot tall.16
The
plant belongs to a monotypic genus (i.e., it is the only species in the genus Dionaea). It is closely related to the waterwheel plant (Aldrovanda vesiculosa), which also
belongs to a monotypic genus in the Droseraceae family (though there are
extinct Aldrovanda species).8
The waterwheel plant is a rootless,
free-floating, freshwater carnivorous plant that consumes aquatic invertebrates
and has been called the “aquatic sister” of the Venus flytrap. Unlike the Venus
flytrap, the waterwheel plant is considered endangered according to IUCN Red
List criteria because, even though it is widely distributed geographically, it
has declined over the last century to only 50 confirmed extant locations.37
Phylogenetic
analysis based on DNA sequence data has shown that the Venus flytrap and the
waterwheel plant, which are the only known snap traps (a kind of active trap),
are descended from a common sticky “flypaper” trap ancestor (i.e., one that
captures prey using a sticky mucilage). This ancestor would have been in the
Droseraceae family and would have been similar to sundew (Drosera) species, but it is presumed extinct. According to Gibson et
al., the snap traps adapted to catch and retain larger prey, resulting in
disproportionate rewards, compared to the sticky traps, which allow larger prey
to escape. It has also been shown that the king sundew (Drosera regia, Droseraceae), a flypaper trap, is the closest known
living relative of the two snap traps.38
Because
there is some disagreement in the scientific community about what exactly
constitutes carnivory in plants, there is also disagreement about how many
carnivorous plant species there are. For example, in 2009, Chase et al.
proposed that some species not widely considered to be carnivores, such as
species in the genus Stylidium (Stylidiaceae),
and some species in the genera Potentilla
(Rosaceae), Proboscidea (Martyniaceae),
and Geranium (Geraniaceae), are just
as carnivorous as other carnivorous species.39
Regardless
how many carnivorous plant species there are, and most sources indicate there
are more than 600, the Venus flytrap may be the most famous of them all,
probably largely because of its ability to snap shut so quickly.40
Other active traps use mechanisms that are different from the two snap traps to
capture prey. For example, aquatic bladderwort species (i.e., aquatic species
in the genus Utricularia [Lentibulariaceae])
pump water out of the bladder of the plant, which decreases pressure inside the
bladder and creates a vacuum that rapidly sucks prey in to be digested when the
trapdoor is triggered to open even slightly.38,41 By even greater
contrast to the snap traps, pitcher plants (species in the genera Sarracenia [Sarraceniaceae], Nepenthes, and others), for example, are
passive traps (specifically pitfall traps) that use nectar to lure prey to slip
into the trap.41 Thus, the snap traps are unique, and this
uniqueness is likely contributes to the Venus flytrap’s popularity.
The Venus
flytrap’s Latin binomial Dionaea
muscipula originated from a published letter, dated September 1, 1768, by
English naturalist John Ellis, who credited the genus name to Swedish
naturalist Daniel Solander. Ellis wrote: “At the request of Mr. Collinson, the
ingenious Dr. Solander … dissected this plant before some of his friends; and
from the beautiful appearance of its milk-white flowers, and the elegance of
its leaves, thought it well deserved one of the names of the goddess of Beauty,
and therefore called it Dionaea…. I
shall only add a specific name to distinguish it from others of this genus,
that may possibly be discovered hereafter. From the structure then and
particular moving quality of its leaves when irritated, I shall call it Dionaea Muscipula, which may be
construed into English … either Venus’s Flytrap or Venus’s Mousetrap.”42
In Greek Mythology, Dione is the mother of Aphrodite, the goddess of love and
beauty, whose Roman counterpart is Venus. In Latin, “muscipula” means
mousetrap.
Ellis
later sent a letter, dated September 23, 1769, to Swedish botanist and “Father
of Modern Taxonomy” Carl Linnaeus, in which he described the Venus flytrap.
Ellis also enclosed a picture of the plant with his letter.43
Linnaeus described the plant as a “miraculum naturae,”39 but
apparently rejected the idea that a plant could consume an animal, saying that
would go “against the order of nature as willed by God.” He reasoned that the
sensitive plants capture animals only by accident, and that once a captured
animal stopped struggling, it would be released.14
In
his book Travels, published in 1791,
American naturalist William Bartram, the son of botanist John Bartram, wrote
the following of the Venus flytrap: “Astonishing production! See the incarnate
lobes expanding, how gay and ludicrous they appear! Ready on the spring to
intrap incautious deluded insects, what artifice! There behold one of the
leaves just closed upon a struggling fly, another has got a worm, its hold is
sure, its prey can never escape—carnivorous vegetable! Can we after viewing
this object, hesitate a moment to confess, that vegetable beings are imbued
with some sensible faculties or attributes, similar to those that dignify
animal nature; they are organical, living, and self-moving bodies, for we see
here, in this plant, motion and volition.”7,44
Years
later, Darwin also knew better than Linnaeus, but even he could not imagine
some of the plant’s abilities before observing a specimen for himself. In a
letter to English botanist Daniel Oliver, dated September 11, 1860, Darwin
wrote: “Lastly would you look at the Dionaea
(if you have living specimen) and observe whether the hairs are viscid, for
it almost passes my belief that the leaf can snap so quick as to catch a fly,
unless it be in some degree entangled….”45
Darwin
later learned differently, and, in Insectivorous
Plants, wrote: “the sensitive filaments of Dionaea are not viscid, and the capture of insects can be assured
only by their sensitiveness to a momentary touch, followed by the rapid closure
of the lobes.”1
The No-Fly Zone: How the Venus Flytrap Catches and Digests Prey
The
Venus flytrap uses sweet-smelling nectar to lure prey into the traps.16
There are between three and six trigger hairs (trichomes) on the inside surface
of each lobe of each trap.46 Presumably to prevent the plant from
wasting energy by responding to non-prey stimuli, such as raindrops and dust,
the trap will close only when one hair is touched twice or two hairs are
touched within about 20 seconds, which indicates the plant can remember the
first electrical signal for a short time.47 If a second signal is
not received within about 20 seconds, the process resets, but if it is, the
cells on the outer surface of the leaf expand rapidly and the trap shuts almost
instantly (in about a tenth of a second; compared to the waterwheel plant,
which can shut in about 10 milliseconds), and snaps from convex to concave.46,47
This type of movement is called thigmonasty (a non-directional response to
being touched).6
More
than three flicks of a trigger hair are necessary for the plant to begin to
secrete the digestive enzymes that dissolve its prey. When the trapped prey
struggles, it trips the trigger hairs repeatedly, and this struggle gives the
plant a way to judge the amount of digestive enzymes needed, and thereby save
energy. More electrical signals from the trigger hairs being tripped seems to
correlate proportionally with more digestive enzymes being secreted.47
The nutrients from the prey are absorbed and, after five to 12 days, the trap
reopens to release the leftover exoskeleton.46
While
larger Venus flytrap plants produce larger traps, it has been shown that the
number of traps per plant actually remains steady or even decreases as the
plants grow larger. Smaller traps on smaller plants seem specialized for
catching smaller prey, especially ants, and larger traps often catch spiders
and beetles.38
After
three to five meals, a leaf will no longer capture prey but will exclusively
photosynthesize for about two to three months before it falls off the plant.
After about 10 unsuccessful closures, a trap will no longer respond to touch
and will only photosynthesize.46 It has been estimated that a Venus
flytrap can live up to 20 years, or possibly longer.6
|
Conclusion
The
Venus flytrap is a sophisticated, one-of-a-kind plant, but, ironically, it is the sophisticated adaptations that this plant has
developed to survive and thrive that have led to the poaching that is now one of
the main threats to the plant’s survival in the wild.
According
to Professor Waller, who co-authored the petition to give the flytrap
protection under the ESA, wild populations can be protected without reducing
demand for the plant. “Let’s encourage [demand],” he wrote (email, March 30,
2017). “Flytraps can be easily propagated. But we do need to shut down poaching
of plants from the few remaining wild populations. So why not give consumers a
way to satisfy their demand for this plant by buying certified propagated
plants? While we are at this, let’s ask for 50 cents or $1 per plant to protect
and maintain wild habitats. Most of us would appreciate the chance to protect
wild populations while indulging our passion for this plant.”
Waller
also thinks that potential habitats for this species need protection from
development and other threats. “Especially the larger blocks of habitat that
work effectively to sustain regular new colonizations,” he wrote. “Second,
these areas need active management if they are to function as habitat for the
flytrap. In particular, we must sustain their hydrologic and fire regimes. In
other words, we need to make sure they stay wet and burn regularly. Flytraps
need sun and water, but they lose these when shrubs overgrow their habitats or
people drain swamps and savannas.”
Flytrap
habitats, however, cannot be burned every year or all at the same time,
according to Waller. “Burning various patches of habitat in alternation with
each other allows a steady stream of new favorable patches to colonize,” he
wrote.
“This
plant charms us all,” Waller wrote. “Carnivorous plants are all fascinating,
but this plant is the most fascinating of all. It is also the sole terrestrial
representative of a remarkable evolutionary event — the evolution of a rapidly
closing snap trap.”
*
One
expert peer reviewer of this article wrote, “the best wild populations from my
experience occurred on military lands that burned from regularly exploding
ordinance.”
† According to an expert peer reviewer of
this article, sea level rise is not an immediate threat to the Venus flytrap.
The reviewer did a GIS model last year and found that the lowest elevation
sites with Venus flytraps were 26 feet above sea level.
‡ According to an expert peer reviewer of this article, the
current conservation assessment for the Venus flytrap found on the IUCN Red
List website is out of date, both because it is 10 years old and, more importantly,
because it used the previous version (Version 2.3) of the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. According
to the reviewer, a reassessment is needed. “This is not to predict that the
category assigned (vulnerable) will be different, but the criteria used will be
more relevant to the data available,” the reviewer wrote.
** Though the law establishes a two-year timeline for
species to be listed under the ESA, a fairly recent study found that it takes,
on average, 12.1 years for a species to be listed. Some species went through
the process in six months, but some species, including many flowering plants,
took 38 years to be listed (most of the history of the ESA).26
—Connor Yearsley
References
- Darwin
C. Insectivorous Plants. New York,
NY: D. Appleton and Company; 1875.
- Mele
C. Venus Flytraps Need Protection from Poachers in North Carolina. New York Times. November 28, 2016.
Available at: www.nytimes.com/2016/11/28/us/venus-flytraps-poaching-north-carolina.html. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- Platt
JR. Venus Flytraps Risk Extinction in the Wild at the Hands of Poachers. Scientific American. January 22, 2015.
Available at: blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/venus-flytraps-risk-extinction-in-the-wild-at-the-hands-of-poachers/. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- McPherson
S, Bailey TS. Dionaea: The Venus’s
Flytrap. Poole, UK: Redfern Natural History Productions; 2012.
- Venus
Flytrap. The Nature Conservancy website. Available at: www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/unitedstates/northcarolina/explore/venus-flytrap-brochure.pdf. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- Venus
Flytrap. National Wildlife Federation website. Available at: www.nwf.org/Wildlife/Wildlife-Library/Plants/Venus-Flytrap.aspx. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- Martin
M. A Long Look at Nature: The North
Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences. Chapel Hill, NC: The University
of North Carolina Press; 2001.
- Dionaea muscipula J. Ellis. Royal
Botanic Gardens, Kew website. Available at: powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:275898-2. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- The
Long Reach of the Monster Plant. Nature.
February 7, 2017. Available at: www.nature.com/news/the-long-reach-of-the-monster-plant-1.21435. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- Amendments
to Appendices I and II of the Convention. CITES website. Available at: www.cites.org/eng/cop/08/prop/E08-Prop-90_Dionaea.pdf. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- General
Assembly of North Carolina Session 2013. North Carolina General Assembly website.
Available at: www.ncleg.net/sessions/2013/bills/house/html/h761v5.html. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- 1976
South Carolina Code of Laws. South Carolina Legislature website. Available at: www.scstatehouse.gov/Archives/CodeofLaws2011/t16c011.php. Accessed March
25, 2017.
- Howell
C. Poaching is Illegal. Carolina Country website. March 2015. Available at: www.carolinacountry.com/issues/2015/carolina-gardens/poaching-is-illegal. Accessed March
28, 2017.
- Zimmer
C. Fatal Attraction. National Geographic.
March 2010. Available at: ngm.nationalgeographic.com/print/2010/03/carnivorous-plants/zimmer-text. Accessed March
31, 2017.
- Kurup
R, Johnson AJ, Sankar S, Hussain AA, Kumar CS, Sabulal B. Fluorescent prey
traps in carnivorous plants. Plant
Biology. 2013;15:611-615. doi:10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00709.x.
- Dionaea muscipula. Missouri
Botanical Garden. Available at: www.missouribotanicalgarden.org/PlantFinder/PlantFinderDetails.aspx?kempercode=d707. Accessed March
25, 2017.
- Who
We Are. North Carolina Coastal Land Trust website. Available at: coastallandtrust.org/who-we-are/. Accessed March
29, 2017.
- Protect
Your Land. North Carolina Coastal Land Trust website. Available at: coastallandtrust.org/protect-your-land/. Accessed March
29, 2017.
- Our
Work. The Nature Conservancy website. Available at: www.nature.org/ourinitiatives/regions/northamerica/unitedstates/northcarolina/placesweprotect/index.htm. Accessed March
29, 2017.
- Dionaea
muscipula. IUCN website. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org/details/39636/0. Accessed April 1,
2017.
- 2001
Categories and Criteria (version 3.1). IUCN website. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org/static/categories_criteria_3_1. Accessed April 1,
2017.
- Overview
of the IUCN Red List. IUCN website. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org/about/overview. Accessed April 1,
2017.
- Dionaea muscipula. CITES website.
Available at: checklist.cites.org/#/en/search/output_layout=alphabetical&level_of_listing=0&show_synonyms=1&show_author=1&show_english=1&show_spanish=1&show_french=1&scientific_name=Dionaea+muscipula&page=1&per_page=20. Accessed April 1,
2017.
- What
is CITES? CITES website. Available at: cites.org/eng/disc/what.php. Accessed April 1,
2017.
- How
CITES works. CITES website. Available at: cites.org/eng/disc/how.php. Accessed April 1,
2017.
- Many
Endangered Species Face Long Waits for Protection. ScienceDaily website. August
10, 2016. Available at: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/08/160810181029.htm. Accessed April 24,
2017.
- Endangered
Species Act Petitions Received by Fish and Wildlife Service. United States Fish
and Wildlife Service website. Available at: ecos.fws.gov/ecp/report/table/petitions-received.html. Accessed April 2,
2017.
- Listing
and Critical Habitat – Overview. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
website. Available at: www.fws.gov/endangered/what-we-do/listing-overview.html. Accessed April 2,
2017.
- Botanist
Lead Petition to Give Venus Flytrap Endangered Species Protection. ScienceDaily
website. October 21, 2016. Available at: www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/10/161021131946.htm. Accessed March
24, 2017.
- Gaascht
F, Dicato M, Diederich M. Venus Flytrap (Dionaea
muscipula Solander ex Ellis) Contains Powerful Compounds that Prevent and
Cure Cancer. Frontiers in Oncology.
2013;3:202. doi:
10.3389/fonc.2013.00202.
- Jamal
MS, Parveen S, Beg MA, et al. Anticancer Compound Plumbagin and Its Molecular
Targets: A Structural Insight into the Inhibitory Mechanisms Using
Computational Approaches. PLoS ONE.
2014;9(2):e87309. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087309.
- Uc-Cachón
AH, Borges-Argáez R, Said-Fernández S, et al. Naphthoquinones isolated from
Diospyros anisandra exhibit potent activity against pan-resistant first-line
drugs Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains. Pulmonary
Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2014;27(1):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pupt.2013.08.001.
- Carnivora: Pharmacology and Clinical Efficacy of a
Most Diverse Natural Plant Extract. WeeksMD website. Available at: weeksmd.com/2008/12/carnivora-pharmacology-and-clinical-efficacy-of-a-most-diverse-natural-plant-extract/. Accessed April 3, 2017.
- Walker
M. German Cancer Therapies. New York,
NY: Kensington Books; 2003.
- FAQ.
Carnivora website. Available at: www.carnivora.com/faq.html. Accessed April 3,
2017.
- Moerman
D. Native American Ethnobotany.
Portland, OR: Timber Press; 1998.
- Aldrovanda vesiculosa. IUCN Red List
website. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org/details/162346/0. Accessed March
26, 2017.
- Gibson
TC, Waller DM. Evolving Darwin’s “Most Wonderful” Plant: Ecological Steps to a
Snap-Trap. New Phytologist.
2009;183:575-587. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02935.x.
- Chase MW, Christenhusz MJM, Sanders D, Fay
MF. Murderous Plants: Victorian Gothic, Darwin and Modern Insights Into
Vegetable Carnivory. Bot J Linn Soc.
2009;161(4):329-356. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.01014.x.
- Dionaea muscipula J. Ellis
(Droseraceae). Oxford University Herbaria website. Available at: herbaria.plants.ox.ac.uk/bol/plants400/Profiles/CD/Dionaea. Accessed March 27,
2017.
- Types
of Carnivorous Plants. Carnivorous Plant Nursery website. Available at: www.carnivorousplantnursery.com/info/cptypes.htm. Accessed March
27, 2017.
- Baldwin
R. The London Magazine, Or, Gentleman’s
Monthly Intelligencer, Volume 37. Princeton University, 1768.
- Ellis
J. Directions for Bringing over Seeds and
Plants from the East Indies and Other Distant Countries. London: Printed
and sold by L. Davis; 1770.
- Jefferson’s
Botanical Perseverance. Monticello website. Available at: www.monticello.org/site/house-and-gardens/jeffersons-botanical-perseverance. Accessed April 4,
2017.
- To
Daniel Oliver 11 September [1860]. Darwin Correspondence Project website.
Available at: www.darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2913.xml. Accessed March
27, 2017.
- How
does the Venus flytrap digest flies? Scientific
American. August 19, 2002. Available at: www.scientificamerican.com/article/how-does-the-venus-flytra/. Accessed April 4,
2017.
- Gorman
J. The Venus Flytrap, a Plant That Can Count. New York Times. February 1, 2016. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/science/the-venus-flytrap-a-plant-that-can-count.html. Accessed April 4,
2017.
|