By Connor Yearsley
In
the Western Ghats mountains of India, a FairWild Standard implementation project
is benefitting plants, people, and animals. For local people, sustainably
harvesting FairWild-certified fruits of belleric myrobalan (bibhitaki; Terminalia bellirica, Combretaceae)
and chebulic myrobalan (haritaki; T. chebula), two medicinally and
economically important tree species, has
provided a better alternative to destructive and dangerous logging. And, unlike
logging, harvesting the fruits provides a recurring benefit.1-3
This FairWild
effort also has protected nesting/roosting sites of two rare hornbill species:
the great hornbill (Buceros bicornis),
also called the great pied hornbill, and the Malabar pied hornbill (Anthracoceros coronatus), both of which may
eat the Terminalia fruits and
disperse the seeds.* The certification project demonstrates the potential social,
ecological, and health-bringing benefits of the FairWild Standard.1-3
According to Josef Brinckmann,
research fellow at Traditional Medicinals and member of the American Botanical
Council (ABC) Advisory Board, it is important to understand that a standard is
a set of rules in the form of principles, criteria, and performance indicators,
with control points that can be audited by a third party to measure compliance.
“The
FairWild Standard, in my experience, is the most rigorous voluntary
sustainability standard (VSS), specifically designed for the sustainable wild
collection of medicinal and aromatic plants, uniquely applying a whole-ecosystem
approach that includes relevant criteria for environmental, economic, and
social sustainability,” wrote Brinckmann, who has helped implement the standard
around the world (email, April 11, 2019).4
“Its implementation
supports sustainable production and trade, quality assurance, biodiversity
conservation, and resilient rural economies, while rewarding the wild-collection
communities for functioning as stewards of sensitive ecosystems,” he added (see
“In-Depth: The FairWild Standard” section).4
Both T. bellirica and T. chebula, the target species of this project, are medium-sized to large deciduous trees with small fruits
(drupes). The fruits of these species are
two of the three ingredients of the triphala
(“three fruits”) formula, along with the fruit of amla (Phyllanthus emblica, Phyllanthaceae).
Triphala is one of the most important and commonly used formulas in India’s
traditional medicine system of Ayurveda and has been used for more than 1,000
years for many purposes, especially as a digestive aid. Human clinical trials
have shown that the formula has antidiabetic and anti-obesity effects and can
reduce abdominal pain, constipation, flatulence, hyperacidity, and mucus.5-6
In January 2019, the
American Herbal Pharmacopoeia (AHP) released a monograph and therapeutic
compendium for the fruit of T. bellirica,
and it is working on monographs and therapeutic compendia for the two other
triphala ingredients and triphala itself, which AHP claims will be the first in
a Western pharmacopeia.7-8
Based on a 2018
assessment, the great hornbill is considered vulnerable according to the Red
List criteria of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN),
meaning it is “considered to be facing a high risk of extinction in the wild.”9
The species mates for life. When the female is ready to lay eggs, she finds a
large tree cavity, often in riverine habitats, and is sealed into the cavity with
a wall made of feces and other materials. As she incubates the eggs, the female
depends completely on the male to feed her and the offspring through a small
opening left in the wall. If anything happens to the male during this time, the
family is doomed, but this nesting strategy provides nearly complete protection
from predators of eggs and hatchlings. One of the few trees big enough for the nest
is T. bellirica, and the great
hornbill reportedly obtains water entirely from the fruits it eats, including Terminalia fruits.3,10-11
Based on a 2016
assessment, the Malabar pied hornbill is considered near threatened according
to the Red List criteria of the IUCN, meaning it “is close to qualifying for or
is likely to qualify for a threatened category in the near future.”12
This distinctive black-and-white bird has a large yellow and black beak that is
topped with its oversized casque (a hollow structure that allows its calls to
resonate through the dense forest habitat). Although its name may imply that its
range is limited to the Western Ghats, it also is found in parts of central and
eastern India and Sri Lanka.12-13
The Project
In
2010, the Applied Environmental Research Foundation (AERF), a conservation
non-governmental organization (NGO) based in Pune, Maharashtra, India, began to
consider the FairWild Standard as a way to address important biodiversity
conservation issues. Since 1996, AERF has conducted conservation projects in
the northern Western Ghats, a global biodiversity hotspot.1,14 The
Western Ghats is a mountain range that stretches about 1,000 miles along the
western coast of India and contains a large proportion of the country’s
biodiversity, much of which is not found anywhere else in the world. In fact,
about a third of the plant species known in India are found in the northern
part of this range.15
AERF
previously determined that about 95% of the forest area (about 9,000 square
kilometers, or 3,475 square miles) in the northern Western Ghats was owned and
managed by local communities. Because of remoteness, a lack of economic
opportunities, and a lack of knowledge about the importance of biodiversity
conservation, these communities often identified logging as their preferred
livelihood option, which has resulted in extensive forest degradation and
biodiversity loss.14
In
2007, according to AERF, it launched India’s first incentive-based forest
conservation initiative. With help from donors, AERF’s “MyForest” initiative
offered farmers a financial incentive to stop logging. At first, many community
members were confused that they could receive benefits for not logging, but the
initiative eventually caught on.14 Now, through conservation
agreements, AERF has secured protection for about 2,400 hectares (9.3 square
miles) of forest in the northern Western Ghats until 2027, according to Jayant
Sarnaik, founding member and joint director of AERF (email, May 9, 2019). But
AERF needed to create financial self-sufficiency to sustain its conservation
efforts for the long term and turned to the FairWild Standard as a potential
solution.1
Further
motivation came when United Kingdom-based Pukka Herbs, which specializes in
organic herbal teas and supplements, expressed interest in purchasing
FairWild-certified fruits of T. bellirica
and T. chebula. AERF was encouraged
by this partnership and inspired Pukka Herbs to also participate in the
MyForest initiative by conserving 50 acres of private forests in the village of
Wadi Adhishti in Ratnagiri, Maharashtra.1,14
AERF
identified two areas for possible implementation of the FairWild Standard.
First, the Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary in Pune is known for the collection
and sale of T. chebula fruits by the
Mahadev Koli, the local tribal community. Second, the forests of Sangameshwar
in Ratnagiri are rich in populations of T.
bellirica trees, many of which are located in sacred groves that are valued
for their religious significance. These groves are important for biodiversity
colonization and act as “stepping stones” for species that pass through the
landscape.1
In
2013, the Darwin Initiative, a UK government grants mechanism that helps protect
biodiversity and the natural environment through locally-based projects
worldwide, awarded three years of support for the FairWild project, which
enabled the University of Kent’s Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE)
to study the ecology of the area. A smaller grant from Keidanren Nature
Conservation Fund also was awarded to TRAFFIC, an NGO that works globally on
wildlife trade issues, to support this project. These funds allowed AERF to purchase
and install equipment for processing (drying and pulverizing) the fruits. They
also allowed AERF to conduct situation analyses, training sessions with the
local communities, and trial collection exercises.1
At
the same time, AERF established a for-profit entity, Nature Connect India Pvt.
Ltd., for conducting transactions related to the manufacturing and sale of the
FairWild-certified processed material. AERF and Nature Connect recognized that
the FairWild premium, a percentage of the value of the product that is returned
to the community for its development needs, could be used to build biogas
plants (thereby reducing the need for the collection of firewood) and/or
improve sanitation, for example. This would encourage conservation of the natural
resources.1
Pukka
Herbs’ Sustainable Herbs Manager Ben Heron worked extensively with Nature
Connect for many years to help coordinate with stakeholders and implement the
necessary good agricultural and collection practices (GACPs) to assure that the
Terminalia fruits meet the standards
of the British Pharmacopoeia and now the AHP, along with organic and FairWild
training and certification (email from Sebastian Pole, co-founder and Master
Herbsmith of Pukka Herbs, May 2, 2019).
Because
of AERF’s previous work in the northern Western Ghats, it had established
valuable relationships with the local people and understood many of the
biodiversity and socioeconomic factors. Through surveys, AERF confirmed that
villagers in the Bhimashankar Wildlife Sanctuary depended mostly on rice (Oryza sativa, Poaceae) cultivation for
their livelihoods, but also depended on income from other sources, of which T. chebula fruits accounted for about
50%. Similar information was gathered at the other site in Sangameshwar.1
In
2015, the first year of FairWild certification, 2.6 metric tons (MTs) of T. bellirica fruit and 3.6 MTs of T. chebula fruit were collected under
the standard. In 2016, 4.6 MTs of T.
bellirica fruit and 4.9 MTs of T.
chebula fruit were collected.1 And, in 2018, 5 MTs of T. bellirica fruit and 4.5 MTs of T. chebula fruit were collected,
according to Sarnaik. Significant quantities of semi-processed fruits were delivered
to Pukka Herbs (3.2 MTs in 2015 and 4.4 MTs in 2016), and the company uses the FairWild-
and organic-certified fruits in its triphala capsules, turmeric (Curcuma longa, Zingiberaceae) active
tea, and lean matcha green tea (Camellia
sinensis, Theaceae).1
Albuquerque,
New Mexico-based Banyan Botanicals, which specializes in Ayurvedic products, purchases
some of the FairWild-certified fruit powder from Pukka Herbs and uses it in its
triphala tablets. “We would also like to use FairWild-certified Terminalia fruit powder in other
products, but the supply is still increasing, as the scope of this project
continues to expand to other communities in the area,” wrote Devang Shah, chief
operating officer of Banyan Botanicals (email, April 10, 2019).
According
to Sarnaik, the demand for the FairWild-certified value chains that AERF
established is growing by about 300% each year. This requires bringing more
areas under certification. For example, in the first year (2015), there were
six certified resource areas in Sangameshwar for T. bellirica. There are now 12 resource areas for T. bellirica, and at least two more will
be added in 2019. The project is taking place on about 200 hectares across all
the sites. In the case of T. chebula,
the land is owned by the local communities, and in the case of T. bellirica, the land belongs to the
government. “For both value chains, the land is not legally protected, and
there are multiple threats to these lands and the resources within,” Sarnaik
wrote (email, April 1, 2019).
The
collectors are told to harvest a maximum of 70% of the fruits from each tree
and leave at least 30% for regeneration, according to Sarnaik. “In any case, it is practically impossible to harvest all the fruits, as
the trees of T. bellirica are quite tall and old,” he wrote. In the case
of T. bellirica, old trees fruit in
alternating years. For T. chebula,
all the trees fruit every year, but the changing climate has an impact on
harvest levels. “Sustainable harvesting practices are well documented for both
species, and collectors are trained every year so they remember the dos and don’ts
of harvesting,” Sarnaik added.
The FairWild
project is safeguarding about 2,000 T.
chebula trees and 500 T. bellirica trees.
Because the trees are wild, they do not require heavy maintenance by the local
communities, but the “sustainable management of the resource area is key to
high-quality fruit production,” Sarnaik wrote. Currently, the project is also
saving three nesting sites of the great hornbill and six nesting/roosting
habitats of the Malabar pied hornbill. One hornbill nesting site typically
supports one offspring each year, according to Sarnaik.
Sarnaik
thinks this project is significant and unique because it has attracted attention
and ensured participation of many stakeholder groups, including local
communities, businesses, academic institutions and individual researchers, nonprofits,
and government institutions. In addition, it may be one of the only projects
“from the forest-based value chain sectors in which the communities at the
grassroots level gained access to the global market for adopting good practices
and sustainable biodiversity use,” he wrote.
“Lastly
and more importantly, with scaling up of the FairWild-certified value chains,
at least for the target species of our projects, positive impacts for biodiversity
conservation grow multifold,” Sarnaik continued. “This is on the grounds that
the entire resource area gets certified, resulting in conservation of many
other plants and animals. All this makes the project unique.”
Shah
noted that “the project is a great example of how one company’s commercial need
can provide opportunity where one may not have existed before. In this case, we
have a need for high-quality T. bellirica
and T. chebula fruits. This
project supports local communities to collect these fruits, which are not as
valued in the local market, in hopes that the increased income is a better and
more sustainable alternative to cutting the trees for wood.”
Locally,
low-quality fruits may sell for less than a dollar per kilogram, according to
Shah. “Whereas we can pay a premium in this case, due to the higher quality of
these fruits,” he wrote. “For this project, the forest areas have been
certified organic along with the FairWild wild-collection practices.”
Pole noted that “with
approximately 25% by volume of all herbs used in the herbal industry coming
from the wild [according to some estimates], it is vital that we have more
sustainable certification for wild harvesting projects. FairWild is the best
standard for this in the world” (email, March 26, 2019).†
According
to Pole, the FairWild Standard also provides a framework to ensure the fair and
equitable sharing of benefits that arise from the use of genetic resources, as
required by the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing (ABS) of the
Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) (email, April 16, 2019).
The Western Ghats project is creating interest among
indigenous communities from other areas, according to Sarnaik. “It is likely
that we will implement [similar projects] at other locations,” he wrote. “For
example, we intend to develop a FairWild value chain for Madhuca longifolia
[Sapotaceae] fruit.”
Sarnaik
said it was challenging to deal with the learning curves and priorities of the different stakeholders who were
involved in this project. “It takes lots of patience, perseverance, and
negotiation skills to address these challenges,” he wrote. For more information on this FairWild project, the Sustainable Herbs Program has provided videos to give an on-the-ground perspective from the wild collectors in India: Promoting Livelihoods the FairWild Way:
Promoting Livelihoods the FairWild Way from Sustainable Herbs Program on Vimeo.
Biodiversity and FairWild - An Introduction:
Biodiversity & FairWild - an introduction from Sustainable Herbs Program on Vimeo.
In-Depth: The FairWild Standard—A Q&A
with Josef Brinckmann
What
are the main stipulations of the FairWild Standard? Which of those are most
important?
JB: All of the main stipulations are important and support each
other. First, a risk assessment must be carried out on the target species for
collection in order to determine whether the species will be managed as a
high-, medium-, or low-risk plant. Then, a resource assessment is carried out
for the entire mapped area where the collection will occur. The resource
assessment considers not only the target species but all species that occur in
the managed area. If it is determined that a threatened species occurs in the
managed collection area, whether flora or fauna, the eventual management plan
must prescribe collection practices that will not be detrimental to the
long-term survival of the threatened species in the habitat. If a threatened or
endangered animal shares habitat with the wild plant collection area, then
additional wildlife-friendly criteria may need to be developed to augment the
plan.
Both the risk and
resource assessments inform the development and implementation of an adaptive
management plan. At this point, it is known what the maximum optimal yield per
year can be, the regeneration rates, and other special considerations for
capacity building and training of the harvesters. Part of the management plan
involves periodic monitoring and evaluation. This may lead to adapting the
management plan to any observed changing conditions, such as impacts of
increasingly extreme weather events. Finally, successful use of the standard
depends on annual audits carried out by trained inspectors from accredited
independent third-party control bodies, as well as trading and labeling rules
for the finished product brands.
Can the standard be applied
universally to any wild plant? Why or why not?
JB: In the years preceding the publication of version 1.0 of the FairWild
Standard in 2006, drafts of the standard, as well as a precursor standard (the
International Standard for Sustainable Wild Collection of Medicinal and
Aromatic Plants [ISSC-MAP]), were test implemented internationally with a
diverse range of plant species, situated in all different ecosystems, from the
Amazon and the Andes, arid zones in Africa, forests and meadows of southern and
eastern Europe, and steppes in floodplains of Asia. It was indeed important to
determine and prove a global applicability of the standard. The precursor ISSC-MAP
was merged into the FairWild Standard version 2.0 in 2010.
What
can be said about the accountability that the FairWild Standard creates, since
retaining the certification seems to depend on all community members?
JB: I don’t actually think
that the FairWild Standard is designed to hold wild-collection companies and/or
their employees or members accountable. Holding collectors accountable sounds
like policing, which is not what it is all about. Of course the individual
collectors undergo capacity building and training (on the requirements of the
standard), but the ones really being held accountable are the product brands
that use the ingredients. Most wild collectors I’ve met take great pride in
their work, and everyone in the village knows each other personally. If one
person is jeopardizing the income of 99 others, the situation will be resolved.
In any case, there are much bigger problems for wild collectors and small
farmers. One of the biggest problems today is how widespread nonpoint-source
pesticide contamination has become, globally. Wild-collection operations in the
most remote locations on the planet have to contend with occasional market
rejections due to detection of pesticide residues of unknown origin, due to
long-range atmospheric transport. The other big problems include alarmingly
rapid loss of biodiversity across the planet (from wild land conversion to
farming or grazing, for example), urbanization, and mass migration of youth
from rural to urban areas. The rural wild-collection communities are aging, and
very few young people are staying to continue the tradition of wild collection
of medicinal plants for local medicine and trade.
Why has the standard not been
implemented more widely? What are the main barriers to its implementation?
JB: Being a member of the FairWild Foundation board of trustees since
2008, I must admit that I have been disappointed in the relatively low interest
and uptake of the standard by industry. But I get it. It is not easy, and the
public is not demanding it. In the meantime, many other “easier” voluntary
sustainability standards (VSSs) have been developed and have become applied more
widely. There is a bigger market for “sustainability lite.”
In my view, however,
even if a brand is not interested in sustainability marketing and use of the
logo on labeling, which certifies that the ingredients are produced in
compliance with the standard, it makes good business sense to use the available
tools and guidance (e.g., the resource assessment and management plan guidance).
Implementing the standard and using the tools give all stakeholders in the
value chain (the wild harvesters, processors/suppliers, and finished product
brands) data that are really useful for long-term planning, quality
assurance/control, and supply chain risk mitigation. I view implementation of
the FairWild Standard as relatively inexpensive insurance. The data inform
planning and reduce uncertainty, especially for fast-growing companies.
How
financially viable is the FairWild Standard?
JB: Financial
viability of implementing the FairWild Standard has to do with the size of the
operation and annual quantity of plants harvested. It would not be economically
viable for a micro-enterprise that harvests only five to 10 tons annually, but
it can be economically viable for a small to medium-sized enterprise that is
harvesting 50 to 100 tons annually, also depending on the market value of the
botanical itself. Almost all FairWild-certified operations in the trading
system were already inspected and certified for compliance with an organic
wild-crop harvesting practice standard. If an operation is already familiar
with the requirements of complying with organic regulations, adding on the
FairWild Standard is not as complicated. However, the operation will still need
a dedicated person for compliance with standards. This person manages the
audits and post-audit corrective action measures, as well as the ongoing
monitoring and evaluation of the collection area, periodic revision of the
management plan as more is learned, and annual training of the qualified
collectors.
There are fixed costs (the
fees charged for the annual inspection and certification), which can be
considerable, especially for remote operations, if the inspector needs to
travel from another country and spend several work days in the field for the
audit. It should also be noted that the FairWild Standard requires that
collectors are paid higher-than-normal farmgate prices and are also recipients
of premium fund monies, which the collectors can use for the purpose of
improving the quality of life in their communities and households. Decisions on
use of the funds are to occur through a democratic process. The FairWild
operators I visit around the world are genuinely appreciative of the additional
funds that help them lead more dignified lives in the very hard work of wild
harvesting plants day in and day out.
* There is photographic evidence that the great
hornbill eats the Terminalia fruits
and disperses the seeds, and it is assumed that the Malabar pied hornbill also
does this, according to Jayant Sarnaik, founding member and joint director of
the Applied Environmental Research Foundation.
† According to
the June 2018 TRAFFIC Report, 60-90% of medicinal and aromatic plant species in
trade are wild collected,2 but Pole thinks that volume is more
indicative of the pressure being placed on natural resources.
Photo credit: All images except FairWild logo courtesy of Sebastian Pole of Pukka Herbs.
References
- Sarnaik
J, Bride IG, Godbole A, Sardeshpande M, Hiremath U, Giri Y. FairWild
certification: An approach for linking biodiversity conservation with
sustainable livelihoods in the northern Western Ghats, India. Satoyama Initiative Thematic Review. 2017;3:90-101.
- Jenkins
M, Timoshyna A, Cornthwaite M. FairWild, Bibhitaki and Haritaki Trees, and the
Great Hornbill. TRAFFIC Report: Wild at Home—Exploring the global harvest,
trade and use of wild plant ingredients. June 2018:35.
- Heron
B. FairWild, the Great Pied Hornbill and the Bibhitaki tree. Pukka Herbs
website. Available at: www.pukkaherbs.com/your-wellbeing/stories/pukka/fairwild-hornbill/.
Accessed April 23, 2019.
- FairWild
Foundation. FairWild website. Available at: www.fairwild.org/.
Accessed April 23, 2019.
- Peterson CT, Denniston K, Chopra D.
Therapeutic uses of triphala in Ayurvedic medicine. J Altern Complement Med.
August 2017;23(8):607-614. doi: 10.1089/acm.2017.0083.
- Baliga MS. Triphala, Ayurvedic
formulation for treating and preventing cancer: a review. J Altern
Complement Med. 2010;16(12):1301-1308. doi:10.1089/acm.2009.0633.
- AHP Monographs—Belleric Myrobalan Fruit.
American Herbal Pharmacopoeia website. Available at: http://herbal-ahp.org/online-ordering-belleric-myrobalan-fruit/. Accessed April 26, 2019.
- Yearsley C, Bauman H. American Herbal
Pharmacopoeia Publishes Monographs and Therapeutic Compendia for Belleric
Myrobalan and Oshá. HerbalGram.
2019;121:34-36. Available at: http://cms.herbalgram.org/herbalgram/issue121/hg121-orgnews-ahpmonos.html. Accessed April 26, 2019.
- Great
Hornbill—Buceros bicornis. IUCN
website. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org/species/22682453/131870948.
Accessed April 26, 2019.
- Laman
T. High on Hornbills. National Wildlife Federation website. February 1, 2009.
Available at: www.nwf.org/en/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2009/Hornbills.
Accessed April 26, 2019.
- Das
N. Seasonal Migration of Great Hornbill Buceros
bicornis in the High Forest Areas of Nameri National Park. Bird Populations. 2014;13:6-9. Available
at: www.birdpop.org/docs/journals/Volume-13/BPJ13-06_Das.pdf.
Accessed April 26, 2019.
- Malabar
Pied Hornbill—Anthracoceros coronatus.
IUCN website. Available at: www.iucnredlist.org/species/22682433/92945240.
Accessed April 26, 2019.
- Malabar
Pied Hornbill—Anthracoceros coronatus.
Hornbill Watch website. Available at: www.hornbills.in/malabar-pied-hornbill.php.
Accessed April 26, 2019.
- MyForest
Summary Report. AERF-Pukka Herbs. August 2016. Accessed April 26, 2019.
- Western
Ghats-A Biodiversity Hotspot. World Wide Fund for Nature website. Available at:
http://wwf.panda.org/knowledge_hub/where_we_work/western_ghats/.
Accessed April 26, 2019.
|