The Traditional Medicines Congress (TMC) has indefinitely adjourned and disabled its web site.1
This group came together in 2004 as a coalition consisting of
organizations representing various traditional and alternative healing
modalities and one trade association.
In 2004 TMC drafted A Proposed Regulatory Model for Traditional Medicines: Guiding Assumptions and Key Components
that called for the creation of a new regulatory category of herbs
called “traditional medicines.” The group’s goal, according to a 2004
press release from the American Herbal Products Association (one of the
TMC members), was “to benefit public health by ensuring access to
traditional medicines in a manner that provides a reasonable
expectation of public safety.”2
Like numerous others in the herb community, in June 2006 the
American Botanical Council (ABC) filed public comments to the TMC. ABC
noted its previous interest and activity with respect to investigating
the potential value of creating a new traditional medicine regulatory
category for herbal products, i.e., prior to the passage of the Dietary
Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (DSHEA).3 (ABC’s comments can be viewed on the ABC website here.)
Although the TMC proposal had widespread support among various
members of the traditional and alternative medicine community, there
were pockets of concern and resistance among numerous traditional
herbalists. According to the Voice for Traditional Herbal Medicine
(VOICES), a grassroots campaign that grew out of the discussion of the
TMC, the TMC proposal would undermine the Dietary Supplement Health and
Education Act (DSHEA), resulting in the public’s having less access to
herbs.4 But in a press release sent by the TMC in 2006,
after the public comment period was extended due to some confusion over
the proposal, the TMC stated that dietary supplements under the DSHEA
would not be required to be sold as traditional medicines. Under the
TMC proposal, this new category, if created, would have been optional
for marketers of herbs and herbal products.5
Due to some of the vocal concerns and resistance expressed by some
members of the herbal community, the American Herbalists Guild, another
member of the coalition, withdrew its support from the TMC. Ultimately,
support for the Congress and the proposal began to wane, so the
congress has disbanded and its Web site no longer exists.
The members of the TMC were the Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine
Alliance (AOMA), American Association of Naturopathic Physicians
(AANP), American Association of Oriental Medicine (AAOM), American
Herbalists Guild (AHG), American Herbal Products Association (AHPA),
Council of Colleges of Acupuncture and Oriental Medicine (CCAOM),
Medicinal Herb Consortium (MHC), National Ayurvedic Medical Association
(NAMA), National Certification Commission for Acupuncture and Oriental
Medicine (NCCAOM).
—Kelly E. Saxton
References
1Traditional Medicines Congress has adjourned, website down [press release]. VOICES. May 16, 2008. 2Traditional
Medicines Congress calls for comments on “Ideal Regulatory Model.” AHPA
Update. Silver Spring, MD: AHPA, Nov 29, 2005. 3American
Botanical Council Comments on Traditional Medicine Congress Proposal
for A Proposed Regulatory Model for Traditional Medicines. Austin, TX:
ABC; June 30, 2006. Available at: http://content.herbalgram.org/abc/press/default.asp?p=ABCcommentTMC. Accessed June 13, 2008. 4Voices for Traditional Herbal Medicine. Home Page. VOICES Web site. Available at http://www.traditionalmedicines.info/. Accessed June 5, 2008. 5Comment period for Traditional Medicine model extended [press release]. Silver Spring, MD: AHPA; Mar 29, 2006. |