PDF (Download) |
- Gotu Kola (Centella asiatica)
- Cognition and Mood
- Elderly
| Date: 10-15-2008 | HC# 050281-362 |
Re: Pilot Study Examines Effects of Gotu Kola on Cognition and Mood in Older Subjects - Results Promising
Wattanathorn J, Mator L, Muchimapura S, et al. Positive modulation of cognition and mood in the healthy elderly volunteer following the administration of Centella asiatica. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;116(2): 325-332.
The age-related decline
in cognitive ability has been characterized as a decrease in attention, memory,
and psychomotor speed. Studies have suggested that this mental decline can be
prevented.
Gotu kola (Centella
asiatica [CA]), is found almost all over the world including in China,
India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand. This plant has a reputation for restoring
declining mental function. It is also touted as having memory-enhancing
effects. The objective of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, pilot
study was to determine the effect of a CA extract on cognitive function and
mood in older Thai subjects.
The CA used in
this study was obtained from Tambon Sila, Khon Kaen Province, Thailand. The plant
was authenticated, a standardized extract was prepared, and capsules were
assembled with 250, 500, or 750 mg of the CA extract. Each subject received one
capsule of placebo or CA extract daily for 8 weeks.
At baseline,
subjects were assessed for cognitive performance, mood, and quality of life.
After a single administration and at 1 and 2 months after treatment, they were
assessed for cognitive performance and mood. Quality of life was assessed after
2 months of treatment.
Cognitive
performance was assessed with a test measuring 9 parameters. In addition, the event-related
potentials (N100 and P300 amplitude and latencies) of all subjects were
measured. These tests required subjects to listen for and to count random audible
tones. Mood was measured via components of the Bond–Lader visual analog scale combined
to form three mood factors: namely, alertness, calmness, and contentment.
Four male and 24
female healthy subjects (mean age 65 ±3.6 years) from the Khon Kaen, Thailand
area were divided into 4 groups: placebo, CA 250 mg, CA 500 mg, or CA 750 mg. At
baseline, there were no significant differences in any measures. No subjects discontinued
the study; no other safety-related results were reported.
In terms of
cognitive ability, subjects receiving CA demonstrated a significant decrease in
reaction time with an increase in the percent accuracy of working memory. The
authors suggest that these findings indicate the CA extract exerted its
influence on both speed and quality of working memory.
CA also improved
mood. Subjects treated with 750 mg/day CA showed a significant increase in
alertness as compared with those treated with placebo after 1 and 2 months of
treatment (P=0.0016 and P=0.0229, respectively). Similarly, CA-treated subjects
(at all dose levels) demonstrated a significant increase in calmness after 1
and 2 months of treatment (P=0.0316 and P=0.0141, respectively). No significant
difference for contentment between CA- and placebo-treated subjects was found.
After 2 months
of treatment with 750 mg/day CA, N100 amplitude significantly
increased (P=0.0087). Previous studies have
demonstrated that the N100 component is interpreted as a sensory gain effect
and is related to attention. The authors suggest that the effect of CA in
improving working memory might be associated with improvement in attention
manifested as increased N100 amplitude.
The authors of
this study conclude that CA extract might improve alertness and calmness, which
in turn improves attention and ultimately improves working memory.
It is reasonable
to suggest that the relationship between the CA treatment and cognitive
improvements is not a simple relationship. Although this study is the first
study to demonstrate (with several valid biological markers) the positive
modulation effect of CA on cognitive function and mood in older
subjects, the precise mechanism underlying these effects requires further
investigation.
The American Botanical Council provides this review
as an educational service. By
providing this service, ABC does not warrant that the data is accurate and
correct, nor does distribution of the article constitute any endorsement of
the information contained or of the views of the authors.
ABC does not authorize the copying or use of the
original articles. Reproduction of
the reviews is allowed on a limited basis for students, colleagues,
employees and/or members. Other uses
and distribution require prior approval from ABC.
|
|
—Jennifer Minigh, PhD
|