PDF (Download) |
- Kava (Piper methysticum)
- Hepatotoxicity
- FasTrak
| Date: 01-15-2009 | HC# 120381-368 |
Re: Critical Analysis of Suspected Cases of Kava Hepatotoxicity: Kava Taken as Directed is Rarely Hepatotoxic
Teschke R, Schwarzenboeck A, Hennermann K-H. Kava hepatotoxicity: a clinical survey and critical analysis of 26 suspected cases. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20: 1182-1193.
Hepatotoxicity has been
associated with the use of chemically defined drugs and herbal remedies taken
as dietary supplements. A thorough causality assessment of herbal
hepatotoxicity has rarely been performed, say the authors. Some published and
spontaneous reports of a possible link between observed liver disease and the
use of kava (Piper methysticum)
extracts are available, but causality in these cases was assessed on an ad hoc
basis by the German regulatory agency BfArM (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittle und
Medizinprodukte, Bonn) for 20 patients in Germany and by the Swiss regulatory
agency Swissmedic (formerly IKS, Interkantonale Kontrollstelle Schweiz) for six
patients in Switzerland, to be very probable, probable, or possible.1
These authors examine the details of those 26 cases to assess the causal
relationship using the validated and commonly accepted quantitative criteria of
CIOMS (Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences).2
Because the basic information provided by the national regulatory agencies for
the patients was scanty, the authors obtained additional patient data from
various sources.
According to the authors, the
26 patients ranged in age from 23 to 81 years, and the ratio of males to
females was 1:8. Kavapyrones (syn. kavalactones) were consumed in ethanolic
(n=14) or acetonic (n=10) kava extracts; the extraction medium was unknown in
the remaining two patients. The German patients had taken either an acetonic or
ethanolic kava extract, and those from Switzerland all used an acetonic
one. The ingredients of the kava extracts were derived from the dried rhizome
of kava which has been used in the South Pacific for centuries as a water
extract of the fresh or dried rhizome with no evidence of hepatotoxicity.
Of the 24 patients for which
the daily kava dose and duration of treatment was known, only five adhered to
the German Commission E recommendations regarding both the daily kava dose and
the duration of treatment (60-120 mg kavapyrones daily for no longer than three
months for a cumulative dose of 10.8 g). For the 24 evaluable patients, the
cumulative kavapyrone dose ranged from 1.3 to 432.0 g. Information regarding
comedications was presented for 22 out of 25 patients; polytherapy included up
to five chemical drugs and dietary supplements in addition to kava. Liver
histology was available in 21 of the 26 patients, showing a wide range of
findings: necrosis alone and combined with hepatitis; hepatitis and
intrahepatic cholestasis; hepatitis and bile duct proliferation; hepatitis,
intrahepatic cholestasis, and bile duct proliferation; intrahepatic
cholestasis; and hepatitis, intrahepatic cholestatis, and cholangitis.
The clinical course was
severe in nine out of 26 patients and included death (n=1), death after liver
transplantation (LTX) (n=2), and LTX with good outcome (n=6).
According to the authors,
causality was unassessable because of the lack of temporal association (n=3),
and excluded, based on kava or drug-independent causes alone (n=12) or combined
with lack of temporal association (n=1). Low CIOMS scores resulted in causality
being either excluded (n=1) or unlikely (n=1), leaving a total of eight
evaluable patients with various degrees of causality for kava, with or without
comedications.
The authors report the following
characteristics of hepatotoxicity revealed by the evaluation of those eight
patients:
- Kava hepatotoxicity may occur
after daily doses of 45-1,200 mg kavapyrones and a therapy ranging between one
week and 24 months.
- Comedication was a risk
factor for the development of kava hepatotoxicity.
- Kava treatment, widely beyond
regulatory recommendations, may be associated with the risk for
life-threatening acute liver failure requiring LTX.
- Kava hepatotoxicity may
exhibit high serum levels of alanine aminotransferase compared with alkaline
phosphatase and is characterized by liver cell necrosis, hepatitis, or both.
- The ratio of males to females
was 1:3 [Note: The text says 1:4, but 2 males to 6 females is 1:3.].
- Half of the patients used an
acetonic kava extract and the other half an ethanolic kava extract.
- Under kava-only use, within
the recommendations, hepatotoxicity occurred in a single patient with both a
probable causality of hepatotoxicity for kava in the absence of comedication
and a good outcome after kava cessation.
- In five patients, causality
of hepatotoxicity for kava was graded as only possible and thus weak.
- Two patients required LTX and
survived. One had a daily kava overdose, increased length of kava therapy, and
comedication, with probable causality regarding both kava and comedicated
drugs. The other patient had a daily kava overdose and an increased cumulative
kava dose, with a possible causality for kava.
- Kava hepatotoxicity is the
result of an idiosyncratic reaction of the metabolic rather than the
immunologic type.
The authors conclude that
"kava taken as recommended is associated with rare hepatotoxicity, whereas
overdose, prolonged treatment, and comedication may carry an increased
risk." These findings apply specifically to therapeutic use of acetonic
and ethanolic extracts associated with the hepatotoxicity cases. Use of kava
water extract as a traditional social beverage has not been similarly
implicated.
―Shari Henson
References
1BfArM (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinprodukte, Bonn. Federal Institute for Drugs and
Medicinal Products in Germany),
2002. http://www.bfarm.de/de/arzneimittel/am_sicher/stufenpl/Besch-kava-Final.pdf.
2Danan
G, Bénichou C. Causality assessment of adverse reactions to drugs. I. A novel
method based on the conclusions of international consensus meetings:
application to drug-induced liver injuries. J
Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1323-1330. |