Re: Silymarin Enhances Symptomatic Improvements in Acute Hepatitis
El-Kamary SS, Shardell MD, Abdel-Hamid M, et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of silymarin on symptoms, signs and biomarkers of acute hepatitis. Phytomed. 2009;16: 391-400.
Acute hepatitis (liver inflammation) can be caused by
viruses, alcohol, drugs, etc. Viral hepatitis is the most common cause of acute
hepatitis. Symptoms of acute hepatitis can range from flu-like to liver
failure. There is no standard medical treatment for acute viral hepatitis.
Silymarin is the main active constituent of milk thistle (Silybum marianum). Milk thistle and silymarin are used for liver
support; however, the results from randomized controlled trials on alcoholic
liver disease and chronic viral hepatitis (n = 6 trials published) are
inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy
of silymarin for acute hepatitis.
Symptomatic
patients with acute manifestations of hepatitis (n = 105, ≥ 13 years) and
aminotransferase (ALT) levels > 2.5 times the upper limit of normal were
enrolled from Tanta and Banha Fever Hospitals in the Nile Delta, Egypt to
participate in this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Patients received standard recommended 140 mg silymarin (Legalon®;
Madaus GmbH; Cologne, Germany) or the recommended daily
allowance of multivitamin/mineral capsule as placebo 3x/day for 4 weeks.
Assessments were made through 6 visits in an 8-week follow-up. Primary outcome
measures were normalization of bilirubin and hepatic enzymes within 8 weeks,
defined as: alanine transaminase (ALT) ≤ 40 IU/L, aspartate aminotransferase
(AST) ≤ 42 IU/L, total bilirubin ≤ 1.0 mg/dL and direct bilirubin ≤ 0.3 mg/dL.
Other primary outcomes were signs and symptoms of acute hepatitis, while
adverse effects and tolerability of silymarin were also monitored.
The
patients had acute hepatitis from a variety of etiologies: n = 16 (15.2%) with
acute hepatitis A (HAV), n = 35 (33.3%) with acute hepatitis B (HBV), n = 3
with acute hepatitis C (HCV), n = 3 with acute hepatitis E (HEV), n = 2 with acute
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), n = 1 with acute cytomegalovirus (CMV), n = 1
with chronic HBV with acute manifestations, and n = 18 (17.1%) with chronic HCV
infection with acute manifestations. Compared with the placebo group, patients
in the silymarin group had a significantly faster resolution of the mean number
of symptoms of impaired biliary excretion (P = 0.042). Specifically,
silymarin-treated patients had a significant improvement in dark urine (P =
0.013), jaundice (P = 0.02), and scleral icterus (P = 0.043). There was no
significant difference between groups in the improvement in the mean number of
symptoms of hepatocellular damage, except for indirect bilirubin at day 56 (P =
0.012). The decline in the mean levels of ALT and AST did not differ between
the groups. Likewise, there was no significant difference between groups in the
improvement in the mean number of symptoms of liver inflammation, although
subjective indicators showed that patients treated with silymarin had faster
resolution in fatigue (P = 0.06), malaise (P = 0.045), and anorexia (P =
0.061) at 8 weeks post-randomization.
Adverse
events (AEs) were similar in frequency and uncommon in both groups. There were
no serious AEs. Diarrhea is an AE that has been previously reported with
silymarin treatment. In this study, diarrhea was reported infrequently and was
not significantly different between groups.
The
authors conclude that silymarin is safe and well-tolerated by patients with
acute clinical hepatitis. The study showed a trend towards improvement that was
mostly subjective and clinical without a corresponding decline in biomarkers of
inflammation. Since the benefits appear to be mostly subjective, the authors
speculate that the potential beneficial effects of silymarin may not be
captured by traditional laboratory biomarkers (liver enzymes and viral loads).
Although the authors used a mixed population so that the results could be more
generalizable, this study design is a limitation. It is possible that silymarin
is more effective for specific types of acute hepatitis. In addition, animal
studies show silymarin to be beneficial at much higher doses. Larger studies
and higher doses of silymarin should be evaluated. Currently there is no
treatment for acute hepatitis, so even though silymarin did not improve the
underlying inflammatory process it may still help the patient. The authors
suggest that hepatocyte membrane stabilization by silymarin and its scavenging
of free radicals released from damaged cells provide a plausible rationale for
its beneficial influence.