Re: Review Finds Insufficient Evidence to Support Green Tea Consumption for Cancer Prevention
Boehm K, Borrelli F, Ernst E, et al. Green tea (Camellia sinensis) for the prevention of cancer (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD005004. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005004.pub2.
Brewed tea
from the leaves of Camellia sinensis is the second most common beverage
consumed worldwide.1,2 Green, black, or oolong tea are made from the
leaves of this plant. About 20% of the world's tea from C. sinensis is
in the form of green tea, which has a high vitamin and mineral content,
including riboflavin, niacin, folic acid, pantothenic acid, magnesium,
potassium, and manganese. In trials, green tea consumption has been shown to
decrease total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and to
decrease the risk of myocardial infarction. Also, it has been suggested that
green tea's main ingredients, its polyphenols, may inhibit cell proliferation
and have cancer-preventative effects. These authors conducted a review to
assess a possible association between green tea consumption and the risk of
cancer incidence and mortality. They looked at studies comparing a healthy
population with well-matched cancer patients and at studies observing one group
of healthy participants over time.
Catechins
are a subgroup of green tea's polyphenols and are powerful antioxidants.
Epigallocatechin-3-gallate is a catechin believed to be important to the
therapeutic qualities of green tea.
For this
review, the authors included studies in which green tea had been habitually
consumed and which were carried out using interventional studies (randomized
controlled trials, or RCTs), observational studies (prospective cohort studies),
and retrospective case-control studies. Studies with both healthy adults and
adults with various forms of cancer were included. The primary outcome measures
were the number of participants developing cancers (incidence) and the number
of participants dying from cancers (mortality).
The authors
searched the following databases in January 2009: Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Amed, CancerLit, PsycINFO, and Phytobase.
References from published studies were also checked for further studies. The
Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field was contacted and asked to search its
register. Green tea manufacturers were contacted for long-term surveillance
data on green tea products.
Of the 675
articles retrieved from the literature searches, 51 studies met the criteria
for this review: one RCT, 23 prospective cohort studies, and 27 retrospective
case-control studies. The 51 studies included 1,236,687 participants from five
countries and were published between 1985 and 2008.
Of the 23
cohort studies, 18 measured cancer incidence, four measured cancer mortality,
and one measured both. All of the 27 case-control studies assessed any
association between green tea consumption and cancer risk. The lone RCT
measured cancer incidence and quality of life, among other outcomes.
Studies
included data on the following types of cancer: gastrointestinal tract
(gastric, esophageal, pancreatic, colorectal, and liver); urogenital tract
(prostate, ovarian, and urinary bladder); breast; lung; and oral (tongue, gum,
floor, palate, and other parts of the mouth).
The
methodological quality of the epidemiologic studies was measured with the
Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Nine of the cohort studies were of high
methodological quality, 13 of medium quality, and one of low quality. One
retrospective case-control study was of high methodological quality, 21 of
medium quality, and five of low quality.
The authors
report conflicting results of the observational studies measuring the effect of
green tea on the incidence of digestive tract cancers, except for liver cancer,
for which limited evidence reported a preventive effect of green tea
consumption.
Conflicting
results were also found regarding the incidence of prostate and breast cancer.
However, say the authors, in prostate cancer, observational studies with higher
methodological quality and the only RCT suggested a decreased risk in men
consuming higher amounts of green tea or green tea extracts. For breast cancer,
two of the case-control studies but not three of the cohort studies suggested
influence of green tea consumption on the risk of breast cancer. The authors
report limited evidence in regard to the consumption of green tea and a decrease
of the incidence of ovarian cancer and oral cancer in women. In contrast, there
was limited-to-moderate evidence that the consumption of green tea did not have
any preventative effects on lung cancer, especially in men, and urinary bladder
cancer or that it could even increase the risk of the latter.
The authors
found moderate-to-strong evidence that consuming green tea does not decrease
the risk of dying from gastric cancer and limited-to-moderate evidence that
this is also true for lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer.
Among the
limitations of this review is the varied methodological quality of the
observational studies. Also, the authors note that, based on the included
studies, they could make only limited statements about the association between
green tea intake and cancer incidence or mortality because most of the studies
were carried out in Asia, where drinking green
tea is more of a culturally based tradition than in other parts of the world.
Apart from this possible location bias, the authors say, observational studies
are affected by a number of variables, which may explain their controversial
results.
The authors
conclude that the consumption of green tea appears to be safe at moderate,
regular, and habitual use and can be seen as a healthy addition to the human
diet. However, they continue, "there is insufficient and conflicting
evidence to give any firm recommendations regarding green tea consumption for
cancer prevention."
―Shari Henson
References
1Graham HN. Green tea composition,
consumption, and polyphenol chemistry. Prev Med. 1991;21(3):334-350.
2Weisburger JH. Tea and health: a historical
perspective. Cancer Lett. 1997;114(1-2):315-317.