Re: Meta-Analysis Reveals Short-Term Effects of Cocoa Consumption on Cholesterol Levels in Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease Risks
Jia L, Liu X, Bai YY, et al. Short-term effect of cocoa product consumption on lipid profile: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. July 2010;92(1) 218-225.
Elevated
blood cholesterol levels are a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD),
one of the leading causes of morbidity, mortality, and disability. Diet is a
major factor affecting blood cholesterol levels. Studies have shown that cocoa (Theobroma cacao) and its products, rich
in polyphenols, can affect lipid profiles in persons with
cardiovascular-related diseases. These authors conducted a review of the
scientific literature and a meta-analysis of all published randomized
controlled trials that investigated the effects of cocoa on the lipid profile:
total blood cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and
high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol.
The authors
searched PubMed (from 1950 to May 2009), Embase (from 1966 to May 2009), the
Cochrane Library database, and reviews of relevant articles for clinical trials
that met these criteria: the use of cocoa products matched by a suitable
control arm that allowed any observed effects to be reasonably ascribed to
cocoa; the exclusion of children or critically ill subjects with any degree of
cardiovascular disease; the use of assignable designs (crossover, parallel,
etc.) specifying the treatment type, dose, and duration; the evaluation of
elevated blood lipids by estimating the concentrations TC, LDL cholesterol, and
HDL cholesterol; and the use of food intake control methods.
The studies
were scored on the Jadad scale between 0 and a high score of 5, according to
quality of randomization, blinding, reporting of withdrawals, generation of
random numbers, and concealment of allocation. Extracted data included study
characteristics, population information, and baseline and final concentrations
or net changes of TC, LDL cholesterol, and HDL cholesterol. The authors defined
the estimated principal effects as the net changes in each study variable, which
were calculated as the mean difference (active treatment minus control) in the
changes (follow-up minus baseline).
The authors
initially identified 1,211 potentially eligible studies. After excluding most
of those because they were not clinical trials or because the interventions
were not relevant to the purpose of this meta-analysis, they identified eight
eligible studies with 215 subjects.
The eight
trials varied in size from 15 to 44 subjects. The main sources of cocoa were
dark chocolate and cocoa powder. Of the eight studies, four investigated the
effect of cocoa on healthy subjects and the others investigated the effect in
subjects with cardiovascular risks such as prehypertension and hypertension.
The cocoa products varied in their polyphenol content: from 30 to 963 mg/d.
Duration of treatment varied from two to 18 weeks. Three trials were
double-blinded, and five were crossover trials. Only the three double-blind
trials were classified as high quality studies (Jadad scores of 5); the others
were of low quality (Jadad scores of 2).
Short-term
data from the eight trials showed that LDL cholesterol was significantly lower
in the subjects who consumed the cocoa products than in the placebo-treated
subjects. LDL cholesterol decreased by 5.87 mg/dL (95% confidence interval
[CI]: -11.13, -0.61; P=0.03) in the cocoa group, a 4.82% difference in
reduction compared to placebo. Regarding TC levels, a marginal decrease was
seen in those using cocoa products (-5.82 mg/dL; 95% CI: -12.39, 0.76; P=0.08),
a 3.07% reduction difference.
Subgroup
analyses showed that cocoa consumption could significantly reduce TC (P=0.007)
and LDL (P=0.04) cholesterol in subjects with cardiovascular risk compared with
controls (mean differences of 4.23% and 6.25%, respectively, from placebo);
however, cocoa did not affect blood cholesterol levels in the healthy subjects.
A subgroup analysis also revealed a marginally significant reduction of LDL
cholesterol and a tendency to decrease TC in the subgroup with shorter-term
treatment of 6 weeks or less (P=0.07) but not in those with longer-term
treatment.
The authors
report no evidence of a dose-effect relation or of any change in HDL
cholesterol. However, lower daily doses of cocoa polyphenols (<260 mg)
significantly decreased TC and LDL cholesterol (P=0.0008 and P=0.03,
respectively) compared to controls, whereas middle (260-665 mg) and high levels
(>665 mg) of consumption did not. They note that a sensitivity analysis that
excluded the lower-quality studies indicated that cocoa consumption did not
significantly affect TC or LDL cholesterol levels (P=0.07 and P=0.23,
respectively).
The authors
explain that polyphenols have been shown to inhibit cholesterol absorption and promote
the expression of LDL cholesterol receptors, but that a high dose of
polyphenols has been shown to exert cytotoxic effects on liver cells.
Therefore, they say, higher polyphenol supplementation may counteract its
beneficial biological effects on lipid metabolism.
The authors
acknowledge several weaknesses of this meta-analysis and state that the
long-term effectiveness and appropriate dose range of cocoa consumption are not
clear; however, they suggest that moderate cocoa consumption might be a
worthwhile dietary approach for preventing hypercholesterolemia, particularly
in specific patient subgroups. "Future research effects should concentrate
on higher-quality and more rigorous randomized trials with longer follow-ups to
resolve the uncertainty regarding the clinical effectiveness."