PDF
(Download)
|
- Cocoa (Theobroma cacao)
- Cardiovascular Disease
- Polyphenolic Antioxidants
- Flavanols and Nitric Oxide Metabolism
| Date:
08-31-2011 | HC#
051122-431
|
Re: A Comprehensive Review of Cocoa and Its Health Benefits, History, and Nutritional Profile
Katz
DL, Doughty K, Ali A. Cocoa and chocolate in human health and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011
Jun 13; [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3697.
This
invited review provides a comprehensive, well-written look at the current
research on the health benefits of cocoa (Theobroma
cacao), in addition to its history, economics, nutritional breakdown, and
epidemiology.
Cocoa
is considered an indulgent confection, but in its origins, cocoa was best known
for its medicinal properties, with over 100 different uses recorded between the
16th and 20th centuries. Today, cocoa consumption ranges
from 0.12 kg/person/year in China to 11.85 kg/person/year in Ireland, with the
US in the middle of this range at 5.18 kg/person/year. In 2006-2007, over 1.2
million tons of cocoa were produced in the largest producing country of Cote
d'Ivoire (Ivory Coast).
Processing
consists of grounding, roasting, shelling, and fermenting the cocoa beans
(nibs), which makes a thick paste called cocoa liquor; the amount of cocoa
liquor is what is measured to arrive at the percent cacao (which also includes
the cocoa butter added back into the product) listed on food packaging. When
combined with cocoa butter (the fat component of the nibs) and sugar, it makes
dark chocolate, and milk chocolate when milk is also added. White chocolate is
made using only the cocoa butter from nibs, with added sweeteners and dairy
ingredients. Nibs also contain fiber (most of which is lost with processing)
and minerals such as magnesium, copper, and iron (providing a significant
portion of the RDA). The cocoa butter consists of the monosaturated fatty acid oleic
acid (as in olive oil) and saturated fatty acids palmitic acid and stearic
acid, the latter of which does not elevate serum lipids as do other saturated
fatty acids.
Cocoa
also contains large amounts of polyphenols (a single serving delivers more
phenolic antioxidants than most foods), in particular a sub-class called
flavanols, or flavan-3-ols. These are responsible for the bitter, astringent
taste of dark chocolate. The main flavanols are the monomers catechin and
epicatechin, with polymers called procyanidins or condensed tannins also being
present. Flavanols consist of two carbon rings and a benzene ring; this
tricyclic structure gives rise to its antioxidant properties. Cocoa also contains the methylxanthines
theobromine and caffeine. A table details all of the numerous flavonoids and other
phenolics found in cocoa.
Independent of their
antioxidant nature, cocoa acts in the body by elevating the nitric oxide (NO).
NO acts as a vasodilator and also prevents leukocyte adhesion and migration,
smooth muscle cell proliferation, and platelet adhesion and aggregation. Low NO
is associated with atherosclerosis and increased cardiovascular risk. Epicatechin
has been shown to increase the bioavailability of NO, and while the mechanism
of this is still only partially understood, it is clear that cocoa's benefits
are more substantially related to an NO mechanism than an antioxidant
mechanism.In the last ten years, several
epidemiological studies have been conducted in patients with cardiovascular
disease, diabetes, and no disease. Those eating the highest levels of chocolate
had significantly lower rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac death,
cardiovascular disease, heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, and
diabetes. One of the ways that cocoa polyphenols are thought to modulate the
risk of cardiovascular problems is by downregulating inflammatory mediators
that exacerbate their development. A large number of intervention
trials have been conducted on the effect of cocoa on cardiovascular health. Proper
function of the vascular endothelium is an important factor in the development
of cardiovascular disease. It is modulated by NO. Seventeen human clinical
studies consisting of long-term and acute studies and conducted with either
healthy, smoking, or cardiovascular disease populations have demonstrated that cocoa
or dark chocolate significantly improved flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a
measure of the health and flexibility of vessels. Amounts tested ranged from to
176-917 mg total flavanols/day. The authors discuss each of the studies in
detail. Platelets also contribute to
cardiovascular health, and NO plays a role in their proper functioning as well.
In a systematic review of 25 intervention studies looking at the effects of
polyphenol-rich foods on platelet function, cocoa was noted as the only food
with consistently positive findings of inhibiting platelet activity. The
authors describe six studies using cocoa in particular and conclude that the
evidence supporting a positive effect is strong and most likely due to the
action of the flavanols. Studies assessing the effect of
cocoa on blood lipids are also reviewed, including a meta-analysis of eight
trials. The authors conclude that the data are limited and inconclusive, but
that at worst chocolate has a neutral effect on lowering of serum cholesterol. Studies
testing effects on oxidation of low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) do
suggest that cocoa may play an important role in reducing this oxidation. The effect of cocoa on blood
pressure has also been studied. Most of the trials have shown that cocoa does
lower blood pressure, though there are a number of conflicting studies and
epicatechin intake varied greatly. The mechanism involved is thought to be due
to NO and possibly inhibition of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE). Overall, the authors conclude
that the beneficial effects on cardiovascular activity are strong, despite the
fact that some of the trials have small populations. Most studies are
randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, and crossover, and reported significant
differences. All of the trials discussed and their effects are catalogued in a
table. Another area of investigation
has been on reducing insulin resistance. The benefit may be a result of either
the antioxidant or NO elevating properties of cocoa. Only a few human studies
have been conducted with mixed results, but the authors contend that there are
plausible mechanisms for a benefit and encouraging data from animal work, and
additional human research should be pursued. Understanding the effects of
cocoa on immune function is also limited by the lack of human studies, though
work in animals and in vitro systems gives reason to believe there could be
positive effects. Of particular interest are effects on prevention of cancer,
and preliminary work has focused on effects on scavenging of free radicals,
inhibition of apoptosis and mutagenesis, and modulation of expression of genes
that could affect carcinogenesis. With regard to neuroprotection,
there is promising preliminary evidence for decreased neuroinflammation (as in
Parkinson's disease), improved cerebral blood flow (important in memory
function and in preventing dementia and stroke), and protection of neurons (a
factor in stroke and Alzheimer's disease). Clinical trials will be necessary to
further clarify these effects. For skin, the antioxidant
properties of cocoa may help prevent erythema due to UV exposure and improve
microcirculation when cocoa is ingested. Obesity may also benefit from
cocoa and chocolate; when ingested in small amounts, they do not cause weight
gain. The NO increasing effects help to improve uptake of glucose and inhibit
fat synthesis. It has also been shown that just the smell of chocolate can
suppress the appetite. The authors state that there is reason to believe that
cocoa may induce favorable metabolic changes and weight loss, though human
studies have not tested this hypothesis. The psychological effects of
chocolate on mood, cravings, and cognitive function have also been
investigated. The craving for chocolate, particularly by women, and
particularly during the perimenopausal period, is probably due to cultural
rather than physiological factors. Depressed mood was shown to increase the
craving for chocolate, but the reasons were unclear. A number of studies point
to the sensory experience of eating chocolate being the most critical factor in
cravings. Improvements in mood and cognitive ability may relate to the caffeine
and theobromine content of cocoa. Studies testing effects on cognitive ability
have had mixed results.
The bioavailablity of cocoa has
been well studied but is not extensively covered in this review. Dose response
testing has shown that serum epicatechin levels reach a peak 2 hours
post-consumption.
Food processing affects the
level of flavanols remaining in the finished product and levels are widely
variable between types of products (milk, dark, white chocolate, cocoa) and
even within categories. The process called "dutching," which is
performed on cocoa nibs and sometimes on the cocoa powder, substantially
reduces the levels of flavanols in the finished product. (Note: Ingredient
lists will often use the term "processed with alkali" to refer to the
dutching process.) Addition of other ingredients such as milk, sugar, and fat
may affect the bioavailability of flavanols, though data have been ambiguous.The potential detrimental effects of cocoa and
chocolate have also been explored. While there is a perception that chocolate
can cause acne and migraine headache, this has not borne out in studies. Chocolate
is also named as an aggravator of gastroesophageal reflux disease, though
studies have not rigorously tested this. Over-indulgence in chocolate can cause
weight gain. The authors end by saying that contrary to the
trend in finding one active ingredient and one mechanism for the benefits of a
food, they believe that cocoa as a whole is the active ingredient and that many
mechanisms of action are at play in the recorded benefits. They point out a
number of avenues for further research by the many different types of
scientists investigating cocoa. One practical question the authors point out
that still remains to be answered is: "How much of what kind of chocolate
is ideal for overall health?" Other unanswered questions include: Who
stands to most benefit? Who is at greatest risk with its regular use? They conclude
that there is a strong body of evidence accumulating for a net health benefit
of routine chocolate consumption, even as the weight gain possibility and food
processing uncertainties must be remembered. —Risa
Schulman, PhD
|