PDF
(Download)
|
- Cocoa (Theobroma cacao)
- Flavanols
- Taste Preference
|
Date:
12-30-2013 | HC# 081311-487
|
Re: Tolerance for High-flavanol Cocoa Powder May Be Similar for Subjects that Prefer Dark Chocolate or Milk Chocolate
Harwood ML, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. Tolerance for high flavanol cocoa powder in semisweet chocolate. Nutrients. 2013;5(6):2258-2267.
Cacao (Theobroma cacao) beans consist of
polyphenolic compounds that provide health benefits, as well as the less
desirable effects of bitterness and astringency. Polyphenolic content is
reduced by some of the processing methods (e.g., fermentation and roasting)
used to produce chocolate, which generally results in a more palatable product,
but with potentially lowered health benefits. Therefore, the goal of this study
was to estimate group rejection thresholds for the increased content of cocoa
powder produced from underfermented cocoa beans, in semisweet-like chocolate
samples.
There were 99
subjects recruited for this study which took place at Penn
State University's
Sensory Evaluation
Center (University Park, Pennsylvania).
The subjects were healthy (age range: 18-45 years) and were non-smokers. Within
this group, 53 preferred milk chocolate, and 46 preferred dark chocolate.
During 1 tasting session, demographic information and rejection thresholds were
obtained. Semisweet chocolate samples were presented as 5 pairs with 1 control
sample (100% "NI natural cocoa powder," with 10-12% fat content;
Blommer Chocolate Company; Chicago, Illinois) and 1 sample that was spiked (35%, 50%, 65%, 80%, or 100%) with
high cocoa flavanol (CF) natural cocoa powder (Mars, Inc.; Elizabethtown,
Pennsylvania) produced from underfermented cocoa beans (10-12% fat content).
The
semisweet chocolate samples were made by combining cocoa butter and sugar with
liquors made from the 2 different cocoa powders. The sample formulation
consisted of non-fat cocoa solids (44%), cocoa butter (29%), canola (Brassica spp.) oil (3%), sugar (23.5%),
and lecithin (0.5%). These contents were mixed, conched (65°C for 4 hours),
tempered, and molded to produce 2.5 g samples. Samples were presented in order
of increasing high CF natural cocoa powder content and the order within the
pairs was randomized. Subjects were instructed to consume the entire sample and
rinse with water between samples. Total phenolic content was also measured from
the freeze-dried extracts of the 2 different cocoa powders.
The
total phenolic content of NI natural cocoa powder and high CF natural cocoa
powder was 3.4% per weight (g phenolic per 100 g of cocoa powder) and 7.9% per
weight, respectively. A significant association was found for gender and
chocolate preference (P=0.0126). More women than men preferred dark chocolate
(women: n=35; men: n=11), although similar preferences were found for men and
women for milk chocolate (women: n=27; men: n=26); however, the results of this
study did not indicate any significant differences in rejection thresholds
between men and women (P=0.803). Overall, the group rejection threshold for the
high CF natural cocoa powder was 80.7%, which was nearly the same value as the
second to highest percentage of high CF natural cocoa powder in the semisweet
chocolate samples. In addition, it was found that there were no significant
differences in rejection thresholds between the group that preferred milk
chocolate and the group that preferred dark chocolate (P=0.6235).
The
authors conclude that the rejection threshold for high CF natural cocoa powder
was equivalent to a sample with 80.7% of high CF natural cocoa powder and that
the tolerance of these subjects was similar despite their preference for dark
chocolate or milk chocolate; however, other studies have shown that subjects
with different preferences (milk vs. dark) had different rejection thresholds
for chocolates spiked with a bitter compound.1,2 Moreover,
the total phenolic content of the final products was not measured, and the
specific types of polyphenolics were not identified or quantified in each of
the cocoa powders. Future studies should include more descriptive profiles of
the chocolate samples by subjects, as well as provide more detailed information
about the polyphenolic content or other compounds that might influence taste
preferences and tolerance.
—Laura M. Bystrom, PhD
References
1Harwood ML, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. Rejection thresholds
in chocolate milk: Evidence for segmentation. Food Qual Prefer. 2012;26(1):128-133.
2Harwood
ML, Ziegler GR, Hayes JE. Rejection thresholds in solid chocolate-flavored
compound coating. J Food Sci. 2012;77(10):S390-S393.
|