PDF
(Download)
|
- Ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba, Ginkgoaceae)
- Schizophrenia
- Systematic Review/Meta-analysis
|
Date:
02-29-2016 | HC# 071555-539
|
Re: Systematic Review of Ginkgo Extract Studies with Patients with Chronic Schizophrenia on Antipsychotic Medication Demonstrates Its Efficacy as an Adjunct Therapy
Chen
X, Hong Y, Zheng P. Efficacy and safety of extract of Ginkgo biloba as an adjunct therapy in chronic schizophrenia: A
systematic review of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies with
meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res.
2015;228(1):121-127.
The
exact etiology of schizophrenia is unknown. One theory is that excessive free
radical production, oxidative stress, and an increase in lipid peroxides may be
involved in the pathogenesis. Therefore, free radical scavengers may be useful
as a treatment for schizophrenia. Ginkgo (Ginkgo
biloba, Ginkgoaceae) leaf extract is a free radical scavenger and has been
evaluated as a treatment for schizophrenia. The results have been variable.
According to the authors, two published meta-analyses failed to include the
vast published Chinese literature because of lack of access or Chinese language
barrier. Hence, the purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis that
would include English and Chinese published studies evaluating the efficacy and
safety of ginkgo as adjuvant therapy in schizophrenia.
The
following electronic databases were searched from inception through August 28,
2014: PubMed/Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Library, China National
Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data Digital Periodicals, and Chinese
Scientific Journals Database. The following search strategies were used for
article titles and/or abstracts: (EGb 761 OR Gingko biloba OR ginkgo leaf OR
gingko OR ginkgo OR ginko OR bilobalid* OR ginaton OR shuxuening) and (schizophrenia
OR mental illness OR psychosis OR psychotic disorder OR delusion) in
non-Chinese databases, and (yinxing OR yinxingye OR yinxingneizhi OR
baiguoneizhi OR shuxuening OR nao'en [trade name] OR sitailong [trade name])
AND (jingshen-fenlie OR jingshenzhang'ai OR jingshenbing OR jingshenjibing OR
wangxiang) in Chinese databases.
Included
studies met the following inclusion criteria: randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled study with complete data analysis; patients had chronic
schizophrenia; used ginkgo extract as an adjunct therapy to treat schizophrenia;
did not restrict race or nationality; the primary outcome variables were the
Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for the Assessment of Negative
Symptoms (SANS), and/or Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS); the
secondary outcome variables were adverse reactions (including the Treatment
Emergent Symptom Scale [TESS]) and a Rating Scale for Extrapyramidal Side
Effects (RSESE); and any language. The methodological quality of the studies
was evaluated according to the Cochrane
Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Repeated data articles
and duplicate studies were excluded.
A
total of 339 studies (84 from non-Chinese journals and 254 from Chinese
journals) were retrieved with the initial search; however, only eight articles (all
Chinese) met all of the inclusion criteria. [Note: The top box of Fig. 1
indicates that the number of studies is 338; however, the next three box totals
equal 339.]
Together, the studies included 1033 patients (n = 571 treated with ginkgo
extract and n = 462 treated with placebo), with an average onset age range of
30-50 years. One study had n = 512, while the other studies had n = 29, 36, 40,
60, 90, 109, and 157 patients. Duration of disease was ≥ 3 years. Patients were
treated with 240 mg/day ginkgo extract (n = 4 studies) or 360 mg/day ginkgo
extract (n = 4 studies) for eight weeks (n = 1 study), 12 weeks (n = 3
studies), or 16 weeks (n = 4 studies) while being maintained on their original
antipsychotic medication. All studies claimed to have used products containing the
standardized ginkgo extract EGb 761® (Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH &
Co. KG; Karlsruhe, Germany).
The
pooled studies had a low overall risk of bias, and there was no evidence of
publication bias. Seven of the eight studies were combined into a meta-analysis
to determine the effect of ginkgo as an adjunct therapy for total symptoms of
chronic schizophrenia (e.g., delusion, disorganized thinking, and
hallucinations) and all eight studies were included in the meta-analysis of negative
symptoms of schizophrenia (e.g., avolition and psychomotor poverty). There was
no statistical heterogeneity among the studies for either endpoint, meaning
that the clinical or methodological diversity among the studies was not
variable (heterogeneous). The ginkgo group had significantly more improvement
in total symptoms and negative symptoms than placebo (P < 0.01 for both);
however, one study with the largest sample size (n = 512) contributed more
heavily to these outcomes (28.5% and 48.5%, respectively) and this study
reported a benefit of ginkgo.
Five
of the studies reported adverse events (AEs). The AE scores were similar among
groups. The AEs were scored lower in the ginkgo group, but the difference among
groups was not significantly different. One study reported that two placebo-treated
patients received 480 mg/day ginkgo (after the end of the study) as an adjunct
to their psychiatric treatment in an attempt to improve negative symptoms,
which were not responding to therapy. Both patients had severe persecutory
delusions after 12 and 14 days of ginkgo, a symptom that resolved after
removing ginkgo and adding antipsychotic drugs. The authors conclude that the
safety of ginkgo as adjunct therapy for schizophrenia may be related to its
dose, and additional research is needed.
The
authors conclude that ginkgo adjunct therapy may be more beneficial than
antipsychotics alone in people with schizophrenia. The severity of adverse side
effects associated with ginkgo or the herb-drug interaction may be related to
the dose of ginkgo. The authors acknowledge that limitations of the meta-analysis
are that all patients were Chinese and that there were only eight studies
included. This study is valuable – oftentimes, Chinese language studies are
excluded from meta-analyses or reviews because the author cannot read Chinese
or does not have the resources to translate the article – and thus this article
fills a gap in Western-based publications.
—Heather S. Oliff, PhD
|