PDF
(Download)
|
- Ginger (Zingiber officinale, Zingiberaceae)
- Aromatherapy
- Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting
|
Date:
05-31-2016 | HC# 101554-545
|
Re: Ginger Aromatherapy Improves Some Quality-of-Life Parameters for Patients with Breast Cancer Suffering from Chemotherapy-induced Nausea and Vomiting
Lua
PL, Salihah N, Mazlan N. Effects of inhaled ginger aromatherapy on
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and health-related quality of life in women
with breast cancer. Complement Ther Med.
2015;23(3):396-404.
Nausea
and vomiting are troublesome adverse effects of breast cancer chemotherapy which
may negatively affect both patient compliance and quality of life. Ginger (Zingiber officinale, Zingiberaceae)
rhizome is used orally to treat nausea; however, it may cause heartburn,
diarrhea, and mouth irritation. The authors hypothesized that ginger aromatherapy
may prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) without the
potential side effects of oral ginger. Hence, the purpose of this single-blind,
randomized, crossover study was to evaluate the effect of aromatherapy with
ginger essential oil in alleviating CINV in patients with breast cancer undergoing
chemotherapy.
Patients
(n = 75; mean age, 47 years) were recruited from December 2011 to January 2014 from
oncology clinics at Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah in Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu,
Malaysia, and Hospital Raja Perempuan Zainab II in Kota Bharu, Kelantan,
Malaysia. Included patients had a normal sense of smell, were receiving
chemotherapy for breast cancer, had ≥ 2 chemotherapy courses remaining, and had
nausea and/or vomiting of any severity. Patients were excluded if they had any other
type of cancer; were allergic to ginger, perfumes, or cosmetics; or were
undergoing concurrent radiotherapy. All patients received standard CINV drugs
for 6 days. In addition, they wore an aromatherapy necklace with a small bottle
pendant day and night for 5 days during the period of chemotherapy (the authors
do not explain why the aromatherapy was not administered for 6 days as well).
The necklace pendant was 20 cm from their nose. At least 3x/day for at least 2
min, patients held the pendant just under their nose and breathed in deeply,
even if they were not experiencing symptoms.
The
aromatherapy pendant contained 2 drops of either ginger essential oil or
placebo ginger fragrance oil (both from Take It Global Sdn Bhd; Butterworth,
Penang, Malaysia). "While ginger essential oil is a naturally-occurring
substance found in ginger rhizome, the fragrance oil (placebo) is a blend of
aroma components that contains ginger oil extract (a concentrated product) and
synthetic materials (typically the esters, aldehydes and ketones of various
aromatics). Basically, both oils were identical in appearance and texture but
the therapeutic values of fragrance oil may have decreased substantially due to
changes in the chemical structure of the concentrated product (extract) and
mixture of synthetic components." After approximately a 2-week washout (average
time between chemotherapy sessions) when the necklace was not worn, patients
switched to the opposite treatment. Severity of nausea was measured with a
visual analog scale. Incidence of vomiting was recorded. Health-related quality
of life (HRQoL) was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and
Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) at baseline
and 8 days postchemotherapy. The authors do not explain why HRQoL was not
assessed at the end of the aromatherapy.
A
total of 60 patients completed all study visits and were included in the
analysis. The majority of patients (66.6%) were in early stages of disease
(stages I and II), and 86.7% of patients received highly emetogenic (having the
capacity to induce vomiting) chemotherapy. There were no significant
differences between groups at baseline. Blinding was 93.3% effective, with only
4 patients in each group reporting they could detect a difference between the
treatments. Compliance was not reported.
There
was no significant difference between groups in severity of nausea or incidence
of vomiting. However, the ginger essential oil group had a significant
reduction in severity of nausea over time, with the greatest effect in
alleviating acute nausea on day 1 (P = 0.040). In regard to the HRQoL scores, there
was a significant improvement from baseline with ginger essential oil in global
health status (P < 0.001), role functioning (P = 0.002), fatigue (P = 0.001),
pain (P = 0.013), nausea and vomiting (P < 0.001), appetite loss (P <
0.001), and constipation (P < 0.040). The degree of improvement in role
functioning and appetite loss met the criteria for clinically relevant change
(10-point variation from baseline score). No major adverse effects were
reported; 1 patient withdrew due to mild dizziness on day 5 of ginger essential
oil aromatherapy.
In
the discussion, the authors note several points for consideration. The episodes
of vomiting were low across all time points, so it is possible that the
frequency of vomiting was not high enough to detect a therapeutic effect.
Secondly, studies have shown that patients who have previously undergone
chemotherapy are more likely to experience CINV and have increased resistance
to antiemetics. The patients who received the placebo treatment first may have developed
increased resistance before crossing over to the ginger treatment. In addition,
the highly emetogenic chemotherapy used in this trial is associated with
delayed symptoms which are less responsive to treatment. And while there were
limited improvements in the objective measures, the HRQoL scores suggest that
even relatively small reductions in CINV severity may translate to significant improvement
in subjective outcome measures. An acknowledged limitation of the study was that
the severity of nausea and vomiting before enrollment was not measured and was
assumed to be equal across the groups. Also, it is possible that the "placebo"
ginger fragrance had some therapeutic benefit.
The
authors conclude that ginger essential oil had limited effects in reducing CINV;
however, the HRQoL findings "were … encouraging with significant
improvement in several domains." They recommend that future studies
include an untreated control arm (aromatherapy placebo such as water) to give a
more accurate comparison and assessment of the placebo effect.
—Heather S. Oliff,
PhD
|