PDF
(Download)
|
- ArginMax®
- Sexual Dysfunction
- Breast and Gynecological Cancers
|
Date:
06-30-2016 | HC# 061661-547
|
Re: Herbal Supplement ArginMax® Improves Quality of Life but Not Sexual Function in Female Cancer Survivors
Greven
KM, Case LD, Nycum LR, et al. Effect of ArginMax on sexual functioning and
quality of life among female cancer survivors: results of the WFU CCOP Research
Base Protocol 97106. J Community Support
Oncol. March 2015;13(3):87-94.
Those that have experienced breast or
gynecological cancer are often left with sexual dysfunction, such as limited
desire and satisfaction. Targeting blood flow and hemodynamics is a popular
approach to this problem. ArginMax® (The Daily Wellness Company;
Honolulu, Hawaii) is a mixture of L-arginine, Korean ginseng (Asian ginseng; Panax ginseng, Araliaceae) aerial parts
and root, ginkgo (Ginkgo biloba, Ginkgoaceae)
leaf, and damiana (Turnera diffusa var.
aphrodisiaca syn. T. aphrodisiaca, Passifloraceae) leaf,
along with vitamins and minerals. L-arginine supports vascular function, and
ginseng and ginkgo have been investigated for effects on various aspects of the
vascular system.1 This randomized, placebo-controlled trial
investigated the potential effects of ArginMax on sexual function in female cancer
survivors.
The study took place between May 10, 2007, and
March 24, 2010, and patients were recruited from Wake Forest University Community
Clinical Oncology Program (Winston-Salem, North Carolina) member sites. Female cancer
survivors who were 6 months post-treatment with no evidence of cancer, had not
been in another clinical trial within 30 days of the study's start, and had sexual
dysfunction not caused by other reasons were enrolled. Patients were allowed
hormonal therapy and trastuzumab (a chemotherapy drug). Those who were
pregnant, allergic to any component of ArginMax, on other medications such as
anticoagulants or antidepressants, or had other illness, planned surgery, or planned
pregnancy were excluded.
Prior to the study, patients were asked about
their sexual function. If they answered that they had dissatisfaction with
their sex life, had sexual problems, and a desire for improvement, they were
considered. Patients were categorized based on pelvic or non-pelvic cancer and
ovarian function and were randomly assigned to receive ArginMax or placebo. ArginMax
and matched placebo were supplied by The Daily Wellness Company. Neither the exact
dosage of L-arginine and botanicals per caplet of ArginMax nor contents of
placebo were described. Note: The Arginmax website lists the amount per serving
size as 6 caplets, which was the amount the patients received. The amounts for 6
caplets are as follows: L-arginine, 2500 mg; Korean ginseng, 100 mg; ginkgo, 50
mg; damiana, 50 mg.
http://www.arginmax.com/sexual-enhancement-for-women/ingredients.php. Patients took 3 caplets twice per day
for 12 weeks and took note of the total caplets consumed for compliance. At baseline
and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, assessment was made of sexual function, quality of
life, and toxicity.
The primary outcome was the score of the Female
Sexual Function Index (FSFI). This assessment addresses sexual desire, arousal,
lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain, with higher scores meaning better
sexual function. The secondary outcome was health-related quality of life as
measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). This
assessment consists of physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being,
with higher scores meaning better quality of life.
Overall, 186 patients were randomly assigned,
with 92 in the placebo group and 94 in the ArginMax group. Of these patients,
163 (74%) completed the study, with reasons for dropout including refusal of
treatment, loss to follow up, cancer progression, physician advice, surgery, and
other reasons. The number of patients who completed the study per group was not
given. Based on returned caplets, 92.6% of the dosage was taken by the placebo
group, and 92.9% by the ArginMax group. Baseline characteristics were not
significantly different between groups, with a median age of 50 years; 78% had
breast cancer, 12% had gynecologic cancer, and 10% had other types of cancer. Patients
were an average of 41 months past their cancer diagnosis. Prior to treatment, the
majority of patients in both groups had sex <1 time per month, with 22% of
the ArginMax group and 25% of the placebo group never climaxing. Also, the
majority of patients mentioned being unsatisfied with their sex lives, but
categorized their relationships as "very good" or
"excellent."
Patients' FSFI average score at baseline was 14.15
± 0.62, and scores were significantly greater after 4 weeks of treatment in
both groups (17.40 ± 0.80 for the placebo group and 16.66 ± 0.80 for the
treatment group, P<0.001 for both) but were not significantly different
between groups. Even after 12 weeks, scores were improved (17.15 ± 0.91 for the
placebo group and 17.81 ± 0.90 for the treatment group) but remained under 26,
the cutoff considered indicative of sexual dysfunction. It was determined that
ArginMax did not affect FSFI scores, and changes in scores were generally
linked to younger patients, patients that had more interest in sex, and those
having sex more often.
The mean FACT-G score at baseline for patients
was 87.03 ± 1.01 (the scale ranges from 29-106). The scores were significantly
greater for the treatment group as compared to the placebo group after 4 and 12
weeks (P=0.017 and 0.010, respectively). Further statistical analysis revealed
that patient age was significantly correlated with change in the physical score
(P=0.001), length of time from diagnosis was significantly correlated with
change in social score (P=0.028), sexual interest at baseline was correlated
with change in emotional score (P=0.011), and amount of sex was correlated with
change in the functional score (P=0.009).
In total, 5 serious adverse side effects were
observed in this study, with 3 in the ArginMax group and 2 in the placebo
group. Stomach pain, diarrhea, night sweats, insomnia, vulvar abscess,
hyperglycemia, and infection were reported. Hot flashes and headaches were
reported for 66% and 29% of patients, respectively. Neuropathy was reported in
19%, along with nausea and vomiting in 9% and 3%, respectively. The authors
determined that the stomach pain and diarrhea were related to treatment, with
other effects thought to be unrelated.
Overall, ArginMax did not improve sexual function
in female cancer survivors as measured by the FSFI score; however, it did
improve certain quality of life metrics in patients as compared to placebo.
Discussed mechanisms for this result include improved blood flow and/or
psychological benefits of taking part in the study and addressing sexual
problems even if the desired outcome was not reached. The authors mention that
study limitations include a high dropout rate, missing metrics that may have
helped to further assess sexual function, and no comparisons with sexual
function prior to cancer. Additionally, the lack of information about the exact
dosage of the ArginMax components confounds results and is problematic
regarding adverse side effects. Regardless, the improvements in quality of life
of cancer survivors warrants further research into these botanicals.
The Daily Wellness Company provided funding for
this study.
—Amy C.
Keller, PhD
Reference
1Blumenthal M, Goldberg A, Brinckmann J, eds. Herbal Medicine: Expanded Commission E
Monographs. Austin, TX: American Botanical Council; Newton, MA: Integrative
Medicine Communications; 2000.
|