PDF
(Download)
|
- Hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa, Malvaceae)
- Hypertension
- Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone System
|
Date:
07-29-2016 | HC# 011653-549
|
Re: Hibiscus Tea Reduces Hypertension Comparable to Lisinopril
Nwachukwu
DC, Aneke EI, Obika LF, Nwachukwu NZ. Effects of aqueous extract of Hibiscus sabdariffa on the
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system of Nigerians with mild to moderate
essential hypertension: A comparative study with lisinopril. Indian J Pharmacol. 2015;47(5):540-545.
The
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is an important homeostatic
mechanism for regulating blood pressure. Hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa, Malvaceae) calyx aqueous extract has
antihypertension activity and may work via the RAAS. The purpose of this randomized,
controlled study was to evaluate the effect of hibiscus water extract on
components of RAAS as compared with lisinopril, a blood pressure medication and
a known inhibitor of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE).
Patients
with mild to moderate hypertension (n = 75; aged 31-70 years) were recruited at
the Medical Outpatient Clinic of Enugu State University Teaching Hospital,
Parklane; Enugu, Enugu State, Nigeria. Included patients were newly diagnosed with
mild to moderate hypertension according to the World Health Organization–International
Society of Hypertension and were untreated. Excluded patients had diabetes,
nephropathy, cardiopathy, hepatic disease, cancer, were pregnant, had secondary
hypertension, were chronic smokers, or were alcoholics. For 4 weeks, patients
received either placebo (150 mg/kg Ribena® fruit drink, which was
diluted to create a color resembling the hibiscus infusion; Suntory; Osaka,
Japan), 10 mg/day lisinopril (Zestril®; Reals Pharmaceuticals;
Ikeja, Lagos State, Nigeria), or 150 mg/day hibiscus infusion made by the
authors. Dried hibiscus calyces were purchased from Ogbete Main Market; Enugu, Enugu
State, Nigeria. Twenty grams of dried calyces were infused in 1 L of water for
30 minutes. Plasma renin, serum ACE, plasma aldosterone (PA), and blood
pressure were monitored weekly.
Two
patients in the placebo group had an increase in blood pressure and withdrew
from the study. In the lisinopril group, 3 patients developed a cough and
withdrew from the study. No adverse events were reported.
A
total of 76% of the hibiscus group and 65% of the lisinopril group had
normalized blood pressure. Compared with placebo, the hibiscus group had a
significant decrease in systolic blood pressure at week 2 (P < 0.01), week 3
(P < 0.001), and week 4 (P < 0.001), and decreased diastolic blood
pressure at week 4 (P < 0.001). The lisinopril group had significantly
decreased systolic and diastolic blood pressure at week 4 (P < 0.05 and P
< 0.001, respectively) compared with placebo. At week 4, the hibiscus group
had a significantly greater decrease in systolic blood pressure compared with
the lisinopril group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference
between the 2 groups in diastolic blood pressure. Plasma renin increased and
serum ACE decreased in both treatment groups, but there were no significant
differences compared to placebo or between the 2 groups. PA significantly
decreased in both treatment groups compared with placebo (P < 0.001), but
they were not significantly different from each other. The hibiscus extract had
twice the magnesium concentration as placebo.
The
authors conclude that hibiscus extract has a similar mechanism of action as
lisinopril in Nigerian patients with mild to moderate hypertension. The
hibiscus extract could be working via its high magnesium content, ACE
inhibition, and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism. A limitation of the
study is that the results in Nigerian patients may not be transferable to other
ethnic/racial groups. It is well known that incidence and risk of hypertension
and cardiovascular disease has ethnic/racial variability. Nonetheless, in the
Nigerian patient population, the hibiscus water extract may be an efficacious
and cost-effective treatment option. Additional studies are needed to confirm
the findings. The authors have no conflicts of interest.
—Heather S. Oliff,
PhD
|