PDF
(Download)
|
- Bulbine (Bulbine latifolia syn. B. natalensis, Xanthorrhoeaceae)
- Antimicrobial Activity
|
Date:
10-31-2016 | HC# 041653-555
|
Re: South African Bulbine Tuber Has Broad-spectrum Antimicrobial Activity
Yakubu
MT, Mostafa M, Ashafa AOT, Afolayan AJ. Antimicrobial activity of the solvent
fractions from Bulbine natalensis tuber.
Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2012;9(4):459-464.
Bacteria
are becoming resistant to available antibiotics, so new compounds are needed. Bulbine
(Bulbine latifolia syn. B. natalensis, Xanthorrhoeaceae) tuber
is common in South Africa. Historically, it has been used as an antimicrobial
agent; however, the potential antimicrobial activity of bulbine has not been evaluated
in scientific assays. The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the
antimicrobial activity of solvent fractions of bulbine against pathogenic gram-positive
bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and fungi.
Bulbine
was collected from a single population in Sikusthwana village near Alice,
Eastern Cape, South Africa. The identity of the samples was authenticated by D.S.
Grierson of the Department of Botany, University of Fort Hare in Alice, South
Africa, and a voucher specimen was deposited at the Giffen Herbarium,
University of Fort Hare. The tuber material was washed, oven-dried, powdered, and
extracted with 70% ethanol for 24 h. The ethanol extract was freeze-dried,
suspended with water, and partitioned between solvents to produce ethyl acetate,
n-butanol, and water fractions. After drying, stock solutions of the solvent fractions
and ethanol extract were prepared and diluted to the following concentrations: 10,
7.0, 5.0, 3.0, 1.0, 0.5, and 0.1 mg/mL.
The
antimicrobial screening panel consisted of the following organisms: the gram-positive
bacteria Staphylococcus aureus American
Type Culture Collection (ATCC) accession 6538, Streptococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212), Bacillus cereus (ATCC 10702), and Bacillus pumilus (ATCC 14884); the gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli (ATCC 8739), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 19582), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 7700), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 10031), K. pneumoniae (ATCC 4352), Serratia marcescens (ATCC 9986), Proteus vulgaris (ATCC 6830), Proteus vulgaris (CSIR 0030), Enterobacter cloacae (ATCC 13047), Acinetobacter calcoaceticus (UP), and Shigella flexneri (batch no. 0.57); and the
fungi Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus flavus, and Candida albicans. Antimicrobial activity
was evaluated using the agar diffusion method with chloramphenicol and
streptomycin as positive controls and the solvents as negative controls.
Bacterial plates were incubated at 37°C and examined at 24 h; complete
suppression of growth was required for the sample to be deemed active. The
fungal plates were incubated at 26°C for five days. The diameter of the fungal
growth was measured and expressed as the mean of percentage growth inhibition.
Three replicates of each assay were performed.
The
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the positive control streptomycin was
<2 µg/ml against all 16 bacteria. The ethanolic extract inhibited 75% of the
gram-positive bacterial strains and 75% of the gram-negative strains at MICs of
1-10 mg/ml. The n-butanol fraction inhibited 87.3% of the bacteria (75% of the
gram-positives and 91.6% of the gram-negatives) at MICs of 3-10 mg/ml. The
ethyl acetate fraction inhibited all 16 bacteria at MICs of 1-5 mg/ml. The ethyl
acetate fraction had the best (lowest) MIC value against most of the bacteria (the
ethanol extract had a lower MIC of 1 mg/ml against Acinetobacter calcoaceticus
and Serratia marcescens). Against the
diarrhea-causing bacteria, ethyl acetate was the only fraction that inhibited Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Shigella flexneri, and it had the lowest
MIC (1 mg/ml) against Bacillus cereus.
The water fraction did not produce any bacterial inhibition. However, the water
fraction did produce 100% inhibition of Aspergillus
niger and Aspergillus flavus at a
concentration of 0.1 mg/ml. The ethanolic extract, ethyl acetate fraction, and n-butanol
fraction were active against Aspergillus
niger and Aspergillus flavus in a
dose-dependent manner, producing 50-65% inhibition at the 0.1 mg/ml concentration.
None of the extracts were active against C.
albicans. Antifungal positive controls were not used; as a point of
comparison, the reported MIC of amphotericin B against Aspergillus niger is <0.2 µg/ml.
Bulbine
ethanol, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol extracts showed broad-spectrum antimicrobial
activity against the organisms tested, inhibiting gram-positive bacteria,
gram-negative bacteria, and fungi (with the exception of C. albicans). The ethyl acetate fraction was the most potent, with
MICs of 1-5 mg/ml. The authors conclude that bulbine may be a "useful candidate
in the management of infectious diseases caused by gram-negative bacteria."
—Heather S. Oliff,
PhD
Note:
The article contained numerous misspellings of the microbe names as follows:
Shigella is misspelled Shigelia, Shigellia, and Shigelli; Klebsiella pneumoniae
is misspelled Kiebsiella pneumonia; marcescens is misspelled marscens;
Aspergillus is misspelled Aspergilus; and calcoaceticus is misspelled calcaoceuticus.
Also, the bacterium Streptococcus
faecalis is erroneously listed as Staphylococcus
faecalis; since 1984, the proper name for Streptococcus faecalis is Enterococcus
faecalis.
Editorial Comment:
Based on the reported MICs, the antibacterial activity
of the ethyl acetate fraction and antifungal activity of the water fraction are
˃1000-fold less potent than pharmaceutical antimicrobials. Nonetheless, the
findings support the traditional use of this plant as a common, freely
available medicine that can be used as a first line of defense in communities
with limited access to pharmaceutical treatments. It is possible that
activity-guided fractionation may lead to the identification of more potent
fractions/compounds.
|